| |
Choosing Policy Instruments
|
|
Topics
|
| Command and control regulation |
| Markets and trading systems |
| Education, information, and
labeling |
| Grants and direct action (habitat
restoration) |
| Land acquisition |
| Tax Policy |
|
|
Readings
|
|
L: Ch. 11, 12, 14 |
|
RES
28, 29, 30, 31, 32
|
|
R: Ch. 6, 7, 10 |
|
|
Lecture Notes
|
|
|
Handouts
|
| Economic theories and concepts
play an important role in shaping the policy instruments and
alternatives that are available to address environmental problems.
For an interesting example of the connection between supply and demand,
see
this interesting article from the USA Today (1/12) on how natural
gas exploration (increased supply) is driving prices down.
Conversely, this article discusses
how tariffs limit the importation of ethanol from Brazil, which raises
costs for U.S. consumers (Desmoine Register 2008) |
| Command and control regulations
are one of the frequent policy instruments, particularly when it comes
to air and water quality issues. This leads to lots of charges
that the regulations "cost jobs" or impose other economic inefficiencies
that could be avoided using other policy instruments. A recent
manifestation of this policy fight concerns a proposed set of
regulations for coal fired power plants (See
this Washington Post article - 8/11). This led to charges that
the proposed regulation would kill thousands of jobs and boost energy
bills
(see this article from US News - 6/11). But is the charge
true? See this
presentation
from NERA Economic consulting (6/11) and this
report from the Congressional Research Service (8/11) and judge for
yourself. Others obviously make the counter argument - a healthy
environment creates and protects jobs. See this
interesting report
(9/11) from Restore America's Estuaries that makes this argument.
|
|
GAO Report:
Environmental Litigation: Cases against EPA and Associated Costs over
Time (GAO-11-650). |
|
Sometimes government chooses to deregulate activities.
See this article about some
recent
efforts to streamline government regulations (5/11).
Although, many advocate further deregulation. For example,
Sen. Rand Paul wants government to further deregulate toilets and light
bulbs (Politico 3/11). Many republicans have also been trying
to undue the regulation phasing out the incandescent light bulb (See
this story from AP 7/11).
|
|
Taxes on the supply or demand side are often used to
influence behavior. For example, there is a proposal for
Dutch
drivers to pay a tax based on their time on the road rather than
charging a purchase tax and road tax (AP 11/09). Locally, the
Cape Fear Public
Utility Authority has been criticized because it changed the rate
structure to create incentives to use less water (Star News 6/09).
(see also the
article about the water allocation scandal involving Governor Easley).
|
|
The
Obama Administration floats a proposal to create a vehicle miles
traveled tax (The Hill 5/11). How might this influence
driver behavior or the purchasing or automobiles?
|
|
Sometimes government chooses to subsidize the production
or consumption of a particular product of service using grants, loans,
and loan guarantees.
See this
article from describing the wide scale use of subsidies for clean
energy in recent years (NY Times - 11/11/11). However, there have
been a number of notable failures with the Green jobs programs promoted
by President Obama (See
this collection of articles). Perhaps the most controversial
failure is Solyndra (see
this collection of articles) |
|
One of the problems of using policy instruments is that
they can result in unintended consequences. See this collection of
articles describing some of the problems associated with
using stimulus grants and loan guarantees to encourage the production
and consumption of clean energy (11/11). See this article on
how
subsidizing ethanol production is raising food prices (USA Today 2/11).
This article describes how a
tax designed to reduce energy is threatening research on how to produce
green energy in the U.K. (Guardian 5/11). What if cap and trade proposals actually reduced the stigma associated
with polluting and actually led to increased pollution (Download
article from the Christina Science Monitor - 7/08).
|
| Sometimes tax credits are used to
promote consumption. However, enforcement can be a problem.
See this article on
poor IRS enforcement of energy tax credits (GovExec 5/11).
Similarly, see this article on
how auto
dealerships are scamming Chevy Volt Tax Credits (NLPC 5/11).
|
|
GAO
Report: Energy Star Program (process is vulnerable to fraud and abuse)
(GAO-10-470). |
| See this
collection of articles about attempts to regulate CO2 emissions.
|
|
GAO report: Climate Change: Observations on Options for Selling
Emissions Allowances in Cap -and-Trade Program (GAO-10-377) |
| See this article
from the PA Times (June 1996) about Market-based
approaches and tradeable permits.
While a bit dated, have the issue really
changed? |
| See this article about a 2010
proposal to use
loan guarantees to promote the construction of nuclear plants |
| One interesting area where a
number of interesting, albeit controversial, policy alternatives have
been crafted is in waste management and recycling. In
Canada, "Big Brother" is watching (11/10) while in Alexandria, VA is
putting
tracking chips in recycling bins (Washington Examiner 5/10), and
Cleveland, OH is using tracking chips to monitor recycling as well
(8/10). In fact, many cities are turning to the "Trash
Police" to enforce recycling laws (See
this Fox News article 9/10). To reduce trash volume, they are
charging homeowners for trash collection in the UK in new ways and
many
cities in the U.S. are now thinking about this controversial approach to
funding trash collection. Others are taking a different
approach and are dropping recylcing programs due to their added expense
(See
this article about Ocean city, MD 5/10). |
|
|
Web Resources
|
The following agency websites may prove
useful as we move through the semester. |
|
|
Book's that Might Be of Interest
|
For some readings on how
to find solutions to environmental problems see: |
| Rogers, Everett M.. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations.
New York, NY: The Free Press. |
| Rose,
Richard. 1993. Lesson-Drawing in
Public Policy: A Guide to Learning Across Time and Space. Chatham,
NJ: Chatham House Publishers |
| Neustadt, Richard E. and Ernest R. May. 1986. Thinking
in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers. New York, NY:
The Free Press. |
|
For some readings on
policy instruments see: |
| Salamon, Lester M. (ed). 2002. The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New
Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
| Salamon, Lester M. (Ed). 1989. Beyond
Privatization: The Tools of Government Action. Washington, DC: The
Urban Institute Press. |
|
|
|