Home
Up

Tailoring Evaluations

 

Topics

bullet

Who does evaluations?

bullet

Who is your audience?

bullet

Working with clients

bullet

What is tailored?

bullet

Formative vs. summative evaluations

bullet

Scientific vs. practical considerations

bullet

Managing evaluation projects

bullet

Detecting Cheaters and other unintended consequences

  

Readings & Handouts

bullet

Rossi, et al. Chapters 2 & 3

bullet

Wholey, et al. Chapters 1, 2, 4, 9, 10, 23-28

bullet

Reserve #2, #9, #10

bullet

Op Ed: Put a Little Science in Your Life (NY Time, June 1, 2008)

bullet

Handout - What is an expert

bullet

Handout - Article on the importance of communicating results effectively with PowerPoint presentations

bullet

Handout - Risks, Data, and Facts

bullet

Handout - Problems in Education System

bullet

Handouts - Read this article in the MailOnline that describes the results of a study on the importance of eating more vegetables and a rebuttal of the study's conclusions from January '11

bullet

Handout - What really makes Urban Roads Safer?  Read this article in the USA Today and give it some thought (Jan '11)

bullet

Report - JAMA on Obesity and Death (2005) and an article about CDC linking risk of death to obesity

bullet

Handout - Junk Science and Health Care Reform (2009)

bullet

Handout - LA Nutrition Study Evaluation (Newsweek - 8/09)

bullet

Handout - Cheating in the Cash for Clunkers Program (USA Today 8/22/10)

bullet

Handout - Cheating teachers (Star News - 9/08)

bullet

More on Cheating Teachers - USA Today investigative report: Testing the System (Mar. '11)

bullet

Report - Program Evaluation: Experienced Agencies Follow a Similar Model For Prioritizing Research Needs - GAO-11-176

bullet

According the World Health Organization (WHO), cell phones can cause brain tumors and the press seems to agree (See this collection of news reports of the WHO finding).  But do they? See this critique of their finding and a news account from 2 weeks prior to the WHO meeting that said the researchers concluded that there was no clear link?  Also be sure to read page 5 of the WHO press release that describes what a group 2b finding is and think about what evidence is needed to reach that conclusion.  A statistical correlation is one thing but what about the substantive significance of their finding.  Understanding that would require first understanding the baseline risk of getting any type of brain cancer in the first place (See NIH fact sheet) and then understanding that gliomas are a subset of the various types of brain cancer and are relatively rare amount the different types.  Moreover, if cell phones did cause cancer, shouldn't there be some detectable increase in brain tumors considering they have been in widespread use for more than a decade?  There does not appear to be much evidence in the medical literature that this is the case. 

 

Lecture Notes

bullet

Download as a PDF file (Supplemental notes from lecture)

 

Web Resources

Professional Societies for Evaluators

bullet

American Evaluation Association

bullet

Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management (APPAM)

  

Organizations and Think Tanks Involved in Evaluation Research
bullet Mathematical Policy Research, Inc.
bulletRand Corporation
bulletUrban Institute
bulletBrookings Institution
bulletAmerican Enterprise Institute
bulletHeritage Foundation
bulletHudson Institute
bulletHoover Institution
bulletCATO Institute
bullet

Resources for the Future

bullet

John Locke Foundation

bullet

National League of Cities

bullet

National Association of Counties (NaCo)

bullet

National Governor's Association

bulletABT Associates
bulletMDRC (nonprofit education and social policy research organization)
bulletPew Charitable Trusts
bullet United Way of America, Outcome Measurement Resource Network
bulletU.S. Government Accounting Office
bulletU.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
bullet DOE, Energy, Efficiency, and Renewable Energy, Program Evaluation
bullet DOJ, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Center for Program Evaluation
bullet Center for Disease Control, Evaluation Working Group
bullet UCLA Center for Health Policy Research
 
Evaluation Journals
bulletAmerican Journal of Evaluation
bulletNew Directions for Program Evaluation
bulletEvaluation Review (formerly Evaluation Quarterly)
bulletEvaluation Studies Review Annual
bulletEvaluation Practice, Evaluation, and Program Planning
bulletJournal of Public Policy Analysis and Management
bulletEvaluation in Education
bulletEvaluation and Human Services
bulletEvaluation and the Health Professions
 
General Sources for Evaluation Studies
bullet Links to evaluation resources
bullet Planning and Evaluation Resource Center
bulletOnline Evaluation Research Library
bullet Virtual Library - Evaluation
bullet Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology
bullet Applied Survey Research
bullet Western Michigan University Evaluation Center
bulletJoint Center for Poverty Research

Back to Mark T. Imperial's Homepage

Page last modified 11/17/05

Report problems to imperialm@uncw.edu