|

| |
PLS 505
|
Policy Analysis
|
| |
Course
Objectives:
|
| Public
policy analysis is an important subject and all MPA students should be
well versed in the basic concepts and techniques of the discipline.
The product of policy analysis is usable knowledge that informs
decision makers and this advice can come in a variety of forms and is
performed by a wide range of practitioners in the public, private, and
nonprofit sector. This course
is designed to expose students to the art and science of policy analysis
from both a philosophical and technical perspective.
Students will also be exposed to the basic concepts, tools, and
techniques used by analysts in today’s public and nonprofit
organizations. Students will
also learn how to perform a policy analysis.
Specifically, the course objectives are to: |
| |
 | Develop
your appreciation of the complexity of issues, problems and challenges
associated with policy analysis; |
 | Enhance
your ability to analyze policy problems, find creative solutions, and
implement policies and programs effectively; |
 | Learn
how to communicate the results of your analysis to managers,
decisionmakers, and the general public; and, |
 | Ultimately,
help you become a more effective policy analyst. |
|
| |
| These objectives will be met by exposing you to a
variety of theories and concepts as well as practical analytical tools and
techniques derived from these theories.
The course will develop your critical thinking abilities by
analyzing case studies. Your
oral communication skills will be enhanced through class presentations. Writing assignments will be used to improve your ability to
communicate your ideas and arguments in written form. |
| |
|
|
| The following books are required for this course and can be
purchased at local book stores or through vendors on the internet: |
| |
 | Patton,
Carl and David Sawicki. 1993. Basic Methods of Policy Analysis and
Planning. Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
ISBN 0-13-060948-X. (Required) |
 | Mintrom,
Michael. 2003. People Skills for Policy Analysts. Washington,
DC: Georgetown University Press. ISBN 0-87840-900-9
(Required) |
 |
Levitt, Steven D. and Stephen J. Dubner. 2006. Freakonomics [Revised
and Expanded]: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
ISBN 0-06-073132-X. Harper Collins: New York, NY. (Required) |
 |
Dipak K. Gupta, 2001. Analyzing Public Policy: Concepts, Tools, and
Techniques. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
(Recommended) |
 | Bardach,
Eugene. 2009. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis: The Eightfold
Path to More Effective Problem Solving. Third Edition. (New York,
NY: Chatham House Publishers).
(Recommended) |
|
| |
| Additional required readings have been placed on
reserve in
the library or have links on the class web site. Copies of the lecture
notes and overheads used in class can also be found on the class web site. |
| |
Expectations and Approach
|
| This is not a lecture-dominated class where the instructor speaks and
the students passively listen. This
is a seminar class where students take an active part in their learning
through class discussions, group work, and case analysis. Course readings are supplemented with videos, occasional
guest speakers, and other information available on the class web site.
Part of your learning will be cognitive or factual in nature.
However, much of what you learn in this course will involve
developing your analytical skills, enhancing your self-awareness of the
organizations in which you work, and sharing your professional experiences with others
in the class. I encourage you to prepare yourself for, and be open to, the
variety of ways that you can learn from this course.
Another important part of your learning involves the analysis of case
studies. Case studies are
compilations of problem situations actually faced by public managers.
A case places you into a real world situation and forces you to
sort through and analyze various issues or courses of action.
I
encourage you to discuss the cases with others prior to class. |
| |
Course
Requirements
|
|
The
topics, course schedule, topics, readings, and assignments are posted on the
course website. Updates and changes to the schedule are possible and will
be posted on the website. Students should check the website frequently for
changes and postings of supplemental materials.
Your grade in this class will be based on your ability to understand and
apply the theories discussed in the course readings.
More specifically, your grade will depend on your performance on
the following course requirements: |
| |
Class Participation
|
| Students are expected to complete the assigned readings and come to
class prepared to discuss all readings, handouts, and assignments that are
due. To ensure that students
are prepared to discuss the readings, I will randomly ask students to
summarize a reading, describe a theory, or discuss a case. Each student should also be prepared to share with the class
questions that the readings raised and be able to identify the most
significant point or contribution that the author makes to the practice of
public administration.
While attendance will not be taken on a regular basis, poor classroom
attendance may result in a failing participation grade since you cannot
participate if you are not in class.
Therefore, you should notify the instructor when you are unable to
attend class. If you should
miss a session when a video is shown, it may be possible to make
arrangements to view the film privately at the library or to borrow the
video. In certain
circumstances it may also be possible to make-up other in-class activities
with a written assignment if frequent absences have become a problem.
Your participation grade will also be lowered due to the frequent
inability to respond to the instructor’s questions, poor class
preparation, lack of enthusiastic participation in class exercises, or the
failure to treat others in the classroom with respect (e.g., talking while
others are talking, ridiculing other students, etc.).
Simply put, in order to receive an “A” in this class you must
be a civil, active contributor to class and not merely score well on exams
and assignments. |
| |
|
|
| One of the ways we will examine and apply the
concepts discussed in the readings is by analyzing four
cases contained in Part II (Chapters 12 – 15) of Patton and Sawicki’s Basic Methods
of Policy Analysis and Planning.
Since case analysis is essentially self-learning through simulated
experience, its success depends on the lively exchange of information,
ideas, and opinions during case discussions.
Students must come prepared to discuss all aspects of the case,
apply the concepts in the readings to the case, and be able to answer the
questions at the end of each case study or those posed on the class web
site or it will adversely affect your class participation grade.
At the beginning of the semester, you will be assigned
to a team. A separate set
of directions will be provided on the website for preparing your analysis
of the 4 cases and your writing assignment so disregard the directions
provided in the text. Each team must prepare
4 case memos analyzing the
cases listed on the
website. Your memos are limited to 3 single-spaced pages plus any necessary attachments.
A sample memo can be downloaded from the course web site and most
word processing programs have templates that can be used.
Students enrolled in this class should understand that case
analysis executed as a team is a key element of your course responsibility
and you should be available outside of classroom time to meet with your
group members. Each
team will also be responsible for presenting their analysis of
2 cases
to the class. You will
have 10 minutes to present your analysis.
Your
individual grade on these assignments will be the group grade.
Groups are free to allocate responsibilities in any way you want;
however, groups are not expected to carry free riders.
A peer evaluation form will be used when you complete your second
group case memo and an individual grade may be adjusted lower if the team
reports that one of its members did not contribute to the group memos.
Additional instructions and guidance
for preparing case memos and leading the case
discussions is posted on the course web site. |
| |
|
|
| Each student will be required to complete a
thorough, competent, well-written policy analysis with “real world”
implications and grounding such as a briefing paper, white paper, or a
cost-benefit analysis. Students
will be expected to find a client for their analysis (real or
hypothetical) and employ the appropriate analytical technique(s) to
address a policy problem. You
may select your subject from your professional environmental or workplace,
a voluntary organization you belong to, or pick a topic that is consistent
with your concentration provided that it covers a real policy decision
affecting the public or nonprofit sector.
To get the most out of this class, students are encouraged to
contact state and local politicians, managers, and political organizations
to find a reasonable public problem or issue that needs analysis.
A list of potential topics is
also posted on the class website. Students should waste no time in identifying the subject for
their analysis and a primarily criterion should be that it can be
completed within the timeframe of the course.
You will soon discover that these analyses require research and
information to support your analysis.
Accordingly, do not invest your time in a large-scale analysis from
which you cannot obtain the required social, political, and economic data.
You will also be required to periodically discuss
the progress of your analysis with your classmates and any lessons you
have learned to date. These
short presentations will allow you to practice how to communicate your
findings to decisionmakers. This
can and should include asking your fellow classmates for ideas and
opinions about how to overcome the obstacles you confront during your
analysis. Thus, you should
use your instructor and classmates as resources to help you complete your
analysis. Conversely, these
discussions will provide others in the class with a broad overview of the
problems that practitioners confront when performing various types of
analysis.
The assignment will be completed in several stages. Students will be
required to develop a two-page memo that specifies the problem to be
addressed, the client (real or hypothetical), and the question(s) that
the policy analysis will address. Students will later prepare a 2 – 3
page memo that defines the problem and the main factors affecting the
problem, specifies alternatives, and summarizes the criteria that will
be used to evaluate the alternatives. It should also include as an
attachment a list of bibliographic references and your data sources used
in the analysis and any necessary tables (e.g., summary of the
alternatives or criteria) or figures (e.g., map of the causes of the
problem). The first two assignments are ungraded but represent a chance
to get feedback on your reports. Your final report should include a
cover, table of contents, executive summary, the main body of the report
(i.e., discussion of problem, discussion of evaluative criteria,
discussion of each alternative, the systematic comparison of each
alternative using the evaluative criteria and data gathered from your
research, a recommended course of action supported by the data you’re
your analysis, and an implementation strategy for that alternative),
supporting tables and figures, a bibliography, and any necessary
appendices or supporting materials. The report is expected to be clear,
concise, and professional. It should communicate your findings
effectively to your client. Final reports will probably be around 25
double-spaced pages in length but will vary based on the problem and the
type of analysis. |
| |
|
|
|
There
will be one take home exam at the end of the course. The exam will be
posted on the class web site approximately one week before the exam. The
exam format will include both short answer and essay questions. |
| |
Grading
|
| All written work will be evaluated based on your analysis of the
readings and cases, the organization of your ideas, the strength and
substance of your arguments, your ability to properly apply the concepts
discussed in class, and the quality of your writing (e.g., spelling,
grammar, punctuation, etc.). Failure
to complete an assignment or failing to follow directions will result in a
0 for the assignment. The
final course grade will be calculated based upon the following weights: |
| |
|
| Class Participation (20%) |
20% (200 points) |
| Case Memos (20%) |
|
| Memo #1
(Group) |
5% (50 points) |
| Memo #2 (Group) |
5% (50 points) |
| Memo #3
(Group) |
5% (50 points) |
| Memo #4 (Group) |
5% (50 points) |
| Policy Paper/Project (35%) |
35% (350 Points) |
| Exam (25%) |
25% (250 points) |
|
| |
| Course grades will be calculated based on the following:
A (920 – 1000), A- (900 – 919), B+ (880 – 899), B (820 – 879), B-
(800 – 819), C+ (780 – 799), C (720 – 779), C- (700 – 719), D+
(680 – 699), D (620 – 679), D- (600 – 619), and F (0 – 599). In
the event that an assignment is given a letter grade, points are allocated
by using the midpoint of the grade range and multiplying it the number of
possible points. For example, an A for a 5% memo would equal 95% of 50
points or 47.5 while a B+ would equal 89% of 50 points or 44.5.
There
is no rounding up or down.
All members of UNCW’s
community are expected to follow the academic Honor Code. Please read
the UNCW Honor Code carefully (as covered in the UNCW Student
Handbook). Academic dishonesty in any form will not be tolerated in
this class. Be advised that I have a zero tolerance policy for cheating or
plagiarism. Anyone caught cheating or plagiarizing an assignment will
receive a failing grade for the course. |
| |
Late Assignments/Incompletes
|
|
Tentative due dates for course assignments are listed on
the attached course schedule and are subject to change based on class
progress and student preferences. You
should check the course schedule and announcements pages on the course web
site periodically for changes in due dates.
Students may bring forward requests for changing the dates of major
assignments for class approval with a minimum of one-week advance notice
to the class.
Unless I have agreed in advance, all assignments are due at the end of
the class period they are due. Informing
the instructor of your intention to be absent does not waive your
obligation to submit the work that is due. Late assignments lose
one full letter grade per class they are late. An incomplete will only be
granted when there are serious extenuating circumstances that occur after
the withdrawal period. |
|
|
|
Disabilities, Respect, and Harassment |
| |
|
Students with diagnosed
disabilities should contact the Office of Disability Services (962-7555).
Please give me a copy of the letter you receive from Office of Disability
Services detailing class accommodations you may need. If you require
accommodation for test-taking please make sure I have the referral letter no
less than three days before the test.
UNCW has recently
instituted a Respect Compact to affirm our commitment to a civil community,
characterized by mutual respect. That Compact will soon be affixed to the
wall of each classroom and can be accessed at:
http://www.uncw.edu/stuaff/pdc/documents/SeahawkRespectCompact.pdf.
Students are expected to treat others in this class in accordance with this
campus policy.
UNCW practices a zero
tolerance policy for any kind of violent or harassing behavior. If you are
experiencing an emergency of this type contact the police at 911 or UNCW
CARE at 962-2273. Resources for individuals concerned with a violent or
harassing situation can be located at http://www.uncw.edu/wsrc/crisis.html. |
| |
|
Other
Class Policies |
|
Cell phone use will not
be tolerated in this class. Turn off your cell phones prior to class.
If your
phone rings, the Professor reserves the right to answer the call and/or to
confiscate the phone.
Laptops may be used in
this class. Laptop users should sit in the back row to avoid distracting
others. Laptops will be banned from the classroom for the rest of the
semester the first time any laptop user is seen engaging in non-classroom
related activity. |
|
|
|