THE PRESOCRATIC
PHILOSOPHERS
·
“Philosophy begins in wonder. First wonder about the obvious perplexities, such
as eclipses and the origin of the universe and the mystery of death, then about
less obvious things.” –Aristotle
·
“For the ancients have thought, since the time of Socrates, that philosophy was
a guide, a companion, and a blessing in the journey.” –Roman philosopher
Milesians
Thales (600 BC)
·
All things are water (hydor).
·
The earth rests on water.
·
All things are full of gods.
·
The magnet has a soul.
Anaximander (570 BC)
·
The first principle and origin of being is neither water nor any of the other
things called elements, but some other nature which is unlimited (a-peiron), out
of which come to be all the heavens and the things in them.
·
What arose from the eternal [the apeiron] and is productive of hot and cold was
separated off at the coming-into-being of this cosmos, and a kind of sphere of
flame from this grew around the dark mist about the earth like a bark about a
tree. When it was broken off and enclosed in circles, the sun, moon, and stars
came to be.
·
The first animals were produced in moisture. When these water-creatures came out
onto the land, their protective covers broke off, and they lived a different
sort of life. The first humans arose from fish or fish-like creatures.
·
The earth is round and cylindrical, three times as long as in diameter. The
circle of the sun is 27 times that of the earth, the moon 18 times that of the
sun.
·
The things that are perish into the things out of which they come to be,
according to necessity, for they pay penalty and retribution to each other for
their injustice in accordance to the ordering of time.
Anaximenes (540 BC)
·
“The form of air is the following: when dissolved into what is finer, it becomes
fire, winds when then condensed. Cloud results from air when it becomes denser,
and water when this happens to a greater degree. Condensed still more, it
becomes earth; at the densest stage, stones.”
Pythagoreans:
·
Pythagorean mathematics
•
Pythagorean theorem: “The square
constructed on the hypoteneuse of a right-angled triangle is equal to the sum of
the squares constructed on its two sides.” (Or A2 = B2 + C2, where A =
hypoteneuse, B and C sides of a right-angled triangle. For the proof, see
Euclid, Elements I.47.)
•
“The Pythagoreans looked to mathematics, as the basis of rational order in the
universe, and sought the principles of being in mathematics.” (Hence the saying
attributed to Pythagoras, “Being is number.”)
·
Pythagorean psychology and eschatology
•
“Pythagoras declares that the soul is immortal; and that it changes into other
kinds of animals; in addition, that things that happen recur at certain
intervals, and nothing is absolutely new; and that all things that come to be
alive must be thought akin. He [Pythagoras] seems to have been the first to
introduce these opinions into Greece.”
•
“They believe that it is possible to gain release from the cycle of
rebirth/embodiment and ascend to the Isle of the Blessed (heaven) –if one
follows the Pythagorean Way or Path of Life (hodos
tou biou).”
·
Pythagorean ethical akousmata
(“hearkenings” or spiritual sayings) and politics
•
First and hardest: to listen.
•
The soul is the guardian of the vessel (or: of the prison).
•
[Contemplate] the white rooster.
•
[Friends] do not divide bread.
•
It is unholy to live in spotted garments.
•
Straighten the bed when rising from it.
•
Don't poke fire with a knife.
•
Don't step over a broom or a yoke.
•
Don't eat heart.
•
Do not look into a mirror by night.
•
Do not speak without light.
•
Y. [symbol of a divided road, also first letter of Greek for health, Ygeia]
•
“In Croton, a communal form of life arose of men and women bound together by the
strict rules of the Pythagorean existence. Whoever entered such a group had to
renounce private possessions; he underwent a five year period of silence; if he
turned apostate, he was treated as dead, and a gravestone was erected for him.”
Heraclitus
·
Listening not to me, but to the Logos, it is wise to agree: all things are one.
·
Fire lives the death of earth, air lives the death of fire, water the death of
air, earth that of water. The same is living and dead, waking and sleeping,
young and old.
·
Asses would choose rubbish rather than gold. The sun’s breadth is the length of
a human foot.
·
This cosmos, the same for all, none of the gods or humans made, but it was
always and is and ever shall be: an ever-living fire being kindled in measures
and going out in measures.
·
At variance with itself, it agrees with itself—a backwards-turning attunement (harmonia),
like that of bow and lyre.
·
War is the father and king of all.
·
I searched for [sought to find] myself.
·
You would not discover the limits of the soul though you traveled every road: it
has so deep a logos.
·
Character is fate [or divinity].
·
To God all things are beautiful and good and just, but humans have supposed some
just and some unjust.
·
Of those who step in the same rivers, different—again different—rivers flow. It
is not possible to step twice into the same river. We step and we do not step
into the same rivers. We are and we are not.
·
All things flow.
The Ship of Theseus
(from Marc Cohen)
This puzzle tells of a voyage by Theseus’ ship to Crete, which
was followed by a scavenger ship that periodically picked up planks
falling from Theseus' ship, Theseus replacing these with other planks
they found in the water. When Theseus sailed back to Athens from
Crete—still followed by the other—every part of his ship had been
replaced (including sails, rudder, etc.) and the scavenger ship was now
constructed of what had previously made up Theseus' ship.
The puzzle: was Theseus still in the same ship or a different
one? If different, when had it changed? If it did change, did it change
into the scavenger ship, so that now the scavenger ship was identical
with Theseus' old ship, or were these different, too?
Let Theseus' original ship = A, the ship he returns to Athens
with = B, and the scavenger ship on its return to Athens = C. Is A = B?
or is A = C? The Presocratics were familiar with two theories of
identity.
On the component parts theory (CPT), the identity of an object
depends on the identity of its component parts. Since this view asserts
that sameness of parts is a necessary condition of identity, A cannot =
B, and Theseus must have been on (at least!) two different ships.
Moreover, since their parts are the same, A = C, i.e. Theseus' original
ship is now the scavenger ship. Obviously this is problematic. If things
cease to be themselves with any change of its parts, their ‘existence’
is very fleeting, since physical things are constantly losing some of
their material components.
On the spatio-temporal continuity theory (STC), a persisting
object must trace a continuous path through space-time. This is
compatible with a change of parts, so long as the change is gradual. But
how much can it change? what determines which part of the thing must be
preserved, and which can be lost, for it still to be the same entity?
For example, let us suppose that ship A is gradually reconstructed but
that as that occurs, it changes slightly—it gets wider, there are
slightly fewer oars, the steering mechanism is looser, the sails are
smaller, it moves more slowly through the water. At some point we might
say, “It just isn’t the same ship anymore.” But when would that be?
Consider too that an object can be disassembled, then
reassembled, e.g. a bicycle's parts are placed in separate boxes and
shipped across country, the boxes then unpacked and the bike
reassembled. How do we account for its identity? There is no
continuously existing bicycle-shaped object tracing a path through
space-time. CPT, however, says it is the same bicycle, since it is made
of the same parts as the first one. •
How would you answer Heraclitus' puzzle concerning the identity
of objects? •
Which theory do you think is correct and why? •
How might we re-conceive this puzzle in relation to the identity
of the self or the person as they age and change? What makes someone the
same person? •
How might we think about identity in relation to evolution, e.g.
the identity of species, or of individuals as the carriers of genes? |
Parmenides and the Eleatics
Parmenides’ “Truth”
·
“They are carried along by experience, deaf as they are blind, amazed,
uncritical herds, for whom to be and not to be are judged the same and not the
same, and for whom there are in all things opposites.”
·
“That it is and cannot not be is the path of truth.”
·
“In no way may this prevail, that things that are not, are.”
·
“Nothing (no X) can both be and not be nor can any X both have and not have the
same property Y (at the same time and in the same respect).”
·
“That which is … must be. For it is
possible for it to be; and it is not possible for nothing to be.”
·
“Remaining self-same in itself, being is what it is, and does not change; for it
is contained by Necessity within the bonds of Limit; nor is it fitting for what
is to be incomplete, for being cannot be lacking—or it would not be, nor does it
have a coming-into-being or a going-out-of-being but is now and always, evident
to reason if not to the senses.”
Zeno’s Paradoxes
·
If a given number of grains of sand n make a heap, it will not cease to be a
heap, if one is taken away, n-1. But from this one can conclude that if any
given number of grains make a heap, so do all lower numbers, down to zero.
Conversely, if n grains are not a heap, neither are n+1, up to infinitely. Thus
every collection of grains is and is not a heap.
·
If the arrow flies toward the target, it must pass through ½ the distance, then
½ of the remaining distance, and so on. It will always never reach the target.
Likewise, Achilles will never catch up with the tortoise.
·
If the world or any part of it were composed of infinitely many atoms, it would
be unlimited in size, which he thought impossible. (Suppose it is infinitely
large; how could it be made bigger? But it seems anything can be made bigger by
addition.) Likewise, if the world or any part of it were composed of infinitely
small atoms, it would not be of any size, i.e. it would not exist.
·
If there were a point in the infinite past, t-I, with time going infinitely
backwards as it were. How would you ever traverse from t-I to t-0, now? Go as
far back as you wish, you will never get to t-I. So the universe must be
finitely old, i.e. must have come into being. (Aristotle would resolve some of
these puzzles by distinguishing the potential from the actual infinite, and
denying the reality of the latter.)
Xenophanes and Philosophical Theology
·
If oxen and horses and lions had hands, they would draw gods in the shape of
oxen, horses, and lions. The Celts give the gods red hair, the Nubians make them
black.
·
God is one, greatest among gods and men, not at all like mortals in thought or
body. Without effort he shakes all things by the thought of his mind.
·
No man has seen nor will anyone know the truth about the gods and the things I
speak of, for even if what the man said was true, he would not know, but only
shapes a belief about it.
Pluralists
Empedocles (492-432 BC)
·
“I will tell you the beginning, from which all that we gaze upon came to be
clear, earth and the sea with many
waves and the moist air and the Titan aither, squeezing all things round in a
circle. I will tell a double story. For at one time they grow to be only one out
of many, but at another time they grow apart to be many out of one at one time
all coming together into one by Love, and at another being borne apart by the
hatred of Strife.”
·
“On his view, it was of necessity that, for example, the front teeth grew sharp
and well adapted at biting, and the back ones broad and useful for chewing food;
this result was coincidental, not what they were for. On this view, whenever
such parts came about coincidentally as though they were for that purpose, the
animals survived, since their form, though coming about by chance, made them fit
for survival. Other animals, differently constituted, perished, as Empedocles
says of the man-headed calves.” (Physics II.7; compare Curd #54-55.)
Anaxagoras, God and the Universe
·
“All things were together, unlimited in both amount and smallness. These things
being so, it is necessary to suppose that in all things that are being mixed
together there are many things of all kinds, and seeds of all things. Rotation
caused the separating off, and the dense is separated from the rare, and the hot
from the cold, and the bright from the dark, and the dry from the wet. The dense
and the wet and the cold and the dark came together here, where the earth is
now, but the rare and the hot and the dry went out into the far reaches of the
aither.”
·
“For mind (nous) is the finest of all
things and the purest, and has all judgment about everything and the greatest
power. Mind rules all things that possess life—both the larger and the smaller.
Mind ruled the entire rotation, and started the rotation. Mind knew all things
that are mixed together and separated apart. And Mind set in order all things,
whatever kind of things were to be—whatever were and all that now are and
whatever will be.”
·
Anaxagoras was the first to think that all things existed for a purpose (telos),
and strove toward that telos. This was the origin of the idea of teleology.
·
Socrates’ criticism of Anaxagoras: “One day I heard someone reading from a book
of Anaxagoras, that it is Mind that directs and is the cause of everything. I
was delighted with this, and thought that Mind would arrange each thing in the
way that was best. I thought he would tell me, whether the earth was flat or
round, and would then explain, why it was better so; if it was in the middle of
the cosmos, he would show that it was better to be in the
middle. I was prepared to find out the same way about the sun and the
moon and the stars. Once he had given this kind of explanation in regard to each
thing, I thought he would go on to explain the good in things as a whole. This
wonderful hope was dashed as I went on reading and found that the man made no
use of Mind, nor gave it any responsibility in the management of things, but
mentioned as causes only such things as air and aither and water and other
things like that.” (Phaedo 97b-98d.)
·
Nature is, in all of its phenomena, a movement, arising from within the thing
itself, toward an end. This is so of the elemental bodies, of plants and animals
and their parts and actions, of human beings, and of the stars in the
heavens.--Aristotle
Atomists: Science vs. Common Sense
·
Democritus] holds that the substances are so small they escape our senses. They
have all kinds of forms and shapes and differences in size.
·
Out of these elements he says, all visible and perceptible bodies are generated.
As they move they strike against one another and become entangled in a way that
makes them be in contact with and close to one another. When they become
entangled, the compounds appear as water or fire or as a plant or a human.
·
All things are atoms; there is nothing else.
·
Then some stronger necessity comes along from the environment and shakes them
and scatters them about.
·
He makes sweet what is round and good-sized, astringent what is large, rough,
polygonal, sharp tasting what is sharp, salty what is angular and good-sized.
·
Boiling water is a process whereby each twenty-sided water atom was being
reassembled as three four-sided fire atoms plus one eight-sided air atom, i.e.
the formula: 1W (20) 3F (4) + 1A (8).
·
“Nothing happens by random but all things because of a reason and by necessity.”
·
“By convention (nomos), sweet; by
convention, bitter; by convention, hot; by convention, color; in reality (physis),
atoms and the void.”
·
“There are two kinds of judgment, one legitimate, one bastard. The following are
bastard: sight, hearing, smell, taste, touch.”
·
“Do you overthrow us, wretched reason? Then you overthrow yourself.
·
Socrates vs. causal explanations of human conduct:
“It was as if someone said that the
cause of my being here is that my body consists of bones and sinews, and that
the relaxation and contraction of the sinews allows me to bend my limbs and not
mention the true cause, namely, that the Athenians decided to condemn me, and
that I decided that it was better and more right to endure their punishment than
try to escape.” (Phaedo 99bc)