Smith did receive negative criticism from some. Francis Hirst spoke despairingly of Smith's speeches. He concluded that the world is probably not much the poorer in describing Smith's speeches. Hirst claimed that Smith was little more than a borrower from the French School of Rhetoric. Smith began his education of Rhetoric when he entered the University of Glasgow in 1737 at the age of 14 and graduated with great distinction as master of the arts in 1740. He then went on to study Greek, Latin, French, Italian, and English literature at Balliol College and Oxford. Since Smith was a Scottish beneficiary towards getting his education, the church of England made him the promise that he would have to become a practicing clergymen in Scotland. It was in Scotland where Smith and Lord Kames had visions of creating a growing community of speakers and writers in that country.
A man named Lothian wrote an edition of Smith's notebooks but historians aren't even sure if the notebook is actually Smith's. It is also hard to tell if the copyist found implications on the notes and edited them out. Lothian did say that Smith was a man of real genius and when he spoke, his contemporaries were impressed by his lectures.
Adam Smiths system of rhetoric differs in 2 ways. First, he made rhetoric the general theory for all branches of literature. And second, he constructed a theory from previous rhetoric's such as Aristotle, Quintillian, Cicero, and Newton that he saw valid for his generation. These theories that Smith improved on were put into speeches and were the first of their kind to be delivered in Great Britain. These speeches were on narrative discourse, historical discourse, and didactic discourse which seeks to prove proposition to an audience. Didactic discourse also seeks to deliver a system of science to a community of learning. Through these various discourses, Smith tried to make rhetoric appear poetic in a sense.
Smith may confidently be called the earliest and most independent of the New British rhetoricians of the 18th century. Rhetorical theory in the 19th century might have taken a better turn than it did had Adam Smith's lectures been able to survive.
Pete Rader PJR5694@uncwil.edu