Values-Based Grassroots Leadership Development

 

By Mac Legerton, Executive Director, Center For Community Action

 

 

Introduction

 

This paper is a review of the development, activities, and impact of the values-based, grassroots leadership development program of the Center For Community Action (CCA).   The Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Institute (RCGLDI) is the result of a three-year planning process undertaken by CCA through its participation in the Southern Grassroots Leadership Development Learning Program of the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation and MDC.  Following a description of the county, organizational, and program context, the paper provides a description of the development and use of a values-based, grassroots leadership curricula and the interplay between the RCGLDI Institute, its community-based clusters, and community change.   

 

Place Context: Robeson County, N.C.

 

Robeson County is a large, rural county located in the Coastal Plains of Southeastern North Carolina.  Based on the 2000 Census, its multiracial population of 123,000 is 38% Native American, 32% European American, 25% African American, and 5% Latino/Hispanic.  The Asian population is less than 1%.   Its highly diverse population earns Robeson County the distinction of being the most ethnically diverse rural county in the U.S. (Flora, Flora, Spears, & Swanson, 1992).  It is the home of the Lumbee, the largest Native American tribe East of the Mississippi River.  Its present poverty rate of 24% and illiteracy rate of 38% are indicators of low economic and social well being that have persisted for generations.

 

While the people of Robeson County have made major advancements in improving political conditions and systems reform, the county’s contrasting decline in economic and social conditions reveals the significant nature of its present and most serious economic and social crisis in the last 75 years. On the one hand, Robeson County has advanced further in the past 20 years than most, if not all, N.C. counties in achieving racial inclusion and representation in all levels of government through the concerted effort of the majority of its people. On the other hand, its economic and social conditions have significantly declined in the last 10 years, more than most, if not all, N.C. counties as a result of the negative impact of national trade policies that are totally removed from its local control.

 

Since NAFTA was enacted in 1994, Robeson County has experienced a loss of 8,000 jobs, largely in the textile-manufacturing sector.  In October 2001, the unemployment rate reached 12.5%, the highest in N.C.  The rapid, downward spiral of social conditions in Robeson County parallels the massive decline in the economy.  According to the January 2002 report of the North Carolina Dept. of Public Instruction, Robeson County led the state with its high dropout rate.  During the 2000-2001 school year, 10% of all 9-12 graders dropped out of high school. Other social indicators reveal the drop in well being, including the County’s status as the nation’s leader in the number of cases of Syphilis per 100,000 population (Source: Center For Disease Control). 

 

 

Although its social and economic indicators are in decline, Robeson County is rich in ecological and cultural resources. It is home to 50 swamps and 8,000 Carolina Bays, one of the most unique geological features in the Eastern U.S. The Lumber River flows across the county and has been its lifeblood for centuries.  Together, the biodiversity and cultural diversity of Robeson County present a base for new approaches to asset building and sustainable development.

 

Organizational Context: Center For Community Action

 

 Grassroots Leadership embraces many personal values and skills, from strength of character to a practical commitment to fairness and equity, and from a willingness to listen actively and strive for consensus to the ability to set reasonable goals and fulfill commitments”. (Source: “Rationale for a Values-Based Curricula,” Center For Community Action).

 

The Center for Community Action (CCA) is a non-profit, multicultural, community-based organization that was formed in 1980 to organize and empower individuals, families, communities, and institutions in order to unite and improve the quality of life and the equality of life in Robeson County, N.C.  It was developed out of a recognized need for a long-term, multiracial and multicultural, grassroots empowerment organization that utilized community development and systems change strategies to achieve social justice. CCA has facilitated and partnered with other organizations to achieve major systemic changes such as: establishing a public defender system; halting three toxic waste facilities; merging five separate school systems into one county system; redistricting county commission and state legislative lines; restructuring the county’s law enforcement and judicial practices; and acquiring equitable racial representation on the school board, the Board of Commissioners, and the NC House of Representatives. 

 

CCA has also collaborated in many community development efforts, including a prenatal outreach program, a countywide AIDS Task Force, the establishment of five Family Resource Centers across the county, a school readiness and family literacy program, and the establishment of the Robeson Enterprise Community and the Robeson County Partnership For Children.  CCA’s presently has major projects that focus on community organization, adult and youth leadership development, school reform, family literacy, environmental and cultural education and promotion, economic justice, and sustainable development.

 

 

Program Context: Community Organization, Resource, and Education (CORE) Program

 

“Of all the new skills needed, none are as critical as leadership that is home grown, committed to the resolution of local problems and issues, respectful of cultural and ecological diversity, and mindful of the diverse needs and aspirations represented in Robeson County. This is the style of leadership that CCA seeks to expand and nurture inside Robeson County and promote far beyond its borders”. (Source: “Rationale for a Values-Based Curricula,” Center For Community Action).

 

As a result of its participation in the Organizational Development Program of the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation in 1997-1999, the Board of Directors of the CCA decided to regenerate and expand its membership base in community-based cluster groups in the diverse communities of the county.  Clusters are community associations that hold regular monthly meetings and address community needs and issues on the community and countywide level.  The Board also decided to initiate its first, formal grassroots leadership development program in order to educate and train cluster leaders in the skills of community organization and empowerment. This decision was based on many factors, including:

 

(1) The need for a broader and different approach to grassroots leadership development. This need was created by the new access of the grassroots community to political representation and power resulting from the success of CCA’s projects and collaborations with other organizations.

 

(2) The need to institutionalize CCA’s commitment to a grassroots membership and leadership program and create a development plan for it. 

 

(3) For the first time, CCA had the capability to develop a formal curricula and educational program due to increased staff capacity. In 1996, CCA developed a 15-session, formal curricula and educational program entitled Learning Together, a highly participatory, school readiness and family literacy program. In 1999, CCA developed its first place-based education curricula in collaboration with public school teachers and the Rural School and Community Trust.

 

(4) Although CCA sponsored numerous grassroots leadership workshops, conferences, and trainings over its 20 year20-year history, they were all short-term and utilized educational and training materials that were prepared for immediate, not long-term, use.

 

In 2000, CCA was selected as one of 17 Southern nonprofit organizations to participate in the Southern Grassroots Leadership Development Learning Program of the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation and MDC. CCA responded to the compelling need for a new approach to grassroots  leadership development by planning and implementing its Community Organization, Resource, and Education (CORE) Program. Now entering its third year, the CORE Program provides an institutional base and  long-term focus for CCA's commitment to formal grassroots leadership development and civic engagement in the context of its formal, community-based membership clusters and projects. The project acronym was selected to describe its central role in the organization and express CCA’s commitment and relationship with its grassroots members, leaders, and their communities.

 

   The three goals of the CORE Program are:

 

(1) the development, use, evaluation, and improvement of a formal curriculum for grassroots

leadership development in Robeson County;

 

(2) the organization and facilitation of the Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Institute (RCGLDI), a 12-month program in grassroots leadership development and community organizing; and

 

(3) the organization, development, and ongoing support of community-based, membership

cluster groups and their participation in issue-based projects on the community and countywide level.

 

In the CORE Program, CCA has institutionalized and formalized grassroots leadership development on two levels instead of one: the community cluster level and the cluster leadership (countywide) level. While some of the education and training work is the same, the cluster level work is more instrumental and technical in nature, focusing more on the how-to skills that are needed for community organizing and implementing local issue-based projects. The countywide education and training work of cluster leaders focuses on the values-base of the organization and is more transformational and relational in nature, under girding the culture and principles which guide CCA’s grassroots work. The education and training work on both levels combines to deepen and broaden the spirit and power of participants, their communities, the organization, and the county as a whole.

 

The three CORE Program goals posit three distinct capacity building outcomes for grassroots leaders.

 

1. Grassroots leaders will exercise influence from an explicit values and skills base that shapes their role and actions as grassroots leaders. Participants will be clear about their motivations and consistent in the values that inform their commitments, particularly the values addressed in the CORE Program curriculum.

        
Evidence of success takes the form of grassroots leaders who are honest in a manner that mediates and reconciles differences, who do what they say they will do and follow through, and who are compassionate, caring, and fair in attitude and behavior. Other indicators include the spirit and activities within the membership cluster groups that demonstrate unity among their members and the ability of diverse groups of people to work together for the common purpose of community change. Session-based, peer evaluation, focused not only on espoused values but also on the cluster-generated local projects that "incarnate"present them those values, will help leaders do all that they can to inform and inspire others to participate in community change.


2. Grassroots leaders will demonstrate competence in the basic skills of community organizing

         
Evidence of achievement includes the form of well-facilitated cluster meetings; coherent and persuasive written plans for need-based projects and issue-based campaignsprojects; routine and consistent attendance at meetings; use of sign-in sheets; published flyers, press releases, and reports; carefully and persuasively written recommendations and proposals to decisionmakers; thorough minutes from meetings with decisionmakersof policymakers; project evaluations that document accomplishments and challenges; and policy changes resulting from issue-based projects and collaborations.

3. Grassroots Leaders will deepen their knowledge, vision, perspective and commitment to help address the "big picture" issues that significantly impact County residents.

         
Evidence of accomplishment takes the form of leadership in need-based and issue-based projects that effectively and successfully address policies and trends in such areas as the "4 'E's" of CCA: economic development, education, environment, and equity. At the present time, Robeson County is dealing simultaneously with many hardships, including massive job loss caused by NAFTA, struggling schools, and a significant rise in social problems and deteriorating conditions. The engagement of our new leaders in helping cluster groups focus on issues larger than their own neighborhoods will indicate their level of vision and/or commitment to see and address institutional and systemic issues in Robeson County.

What does an effective grassroots leader look like? The best of CCA’s grassroots leaders combine logistical skill, issue knowledge, personal enthusiasm and trustworthiness necessary to inspire and sustain community commitment to resolving persistent community problems. They have the skills and wisdom needed to organize effectively, to work with people from all walks of life, and  to address more systemic and long-term problems facing the County.   They are also trusted to help local residents make firm and plausible connections between the problems plaguing their communities and those affecting the county, state, region, and nation.

 

Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Institute

 

“What I liked best about the Institute is combining the different communities together,

learning about each communityies, and listening to each other’s opinion” Institute Member

 

“When you want to know more, you learn more. I’ve learned something new every time  I’ve come.” Institute Member

 

 

OIn October 10, 2001, 24 cluster leaders and organizers from throughout the county gathered at the Center For Community Action in Lumberton to hold the first meeting of the Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Initiative (RCGLDI). As they registered for the meeting, each person was given a card and instructed to write down one “Gift of Themselves” that they bring into the Institute. The meeting began with a “Go-Around”, a standard CCA practice for opening and closing all meetings: of “going around” the circle or table and inviting everyone to speak. The instructions were to share the one gift of themselves that they wrote down on their card.  As everyone spoke with sincerity, a standard of respectful listening was established. This activity marked the beginning of the Institute and set the tone for all sessions to come.

 

       Four members from each cluster and their organizer attend the Institute. Each session focuses on a distinct value that is germane to grassroots leadership and the development of knowledge, skills, and practice, and the contributions of this value to the social action practice. In Year 1  of the RCGLDI, teams of four cluster leaders and their organizers came from Maxton, Pembroke, Red Springs, Saddletree, and Lumberton.  These are areas represented by the five membership clusters of CCA.  It was a group diverse in race, gender, age, and location. In Year 2 of the Institute, two new clusters will be organized with participating leaders: one in Rowland and one among the County’s growing Latino/Hispanic population. Institute participation will reach 30 in Year 2 with the addition of two new clusters and their organizers. It is anticipated that as membership clusters grow in number, additional Institutes will be formed to accommodate the education and training of additional grassroots leaders and organizers. With over 70 distinct communities in Robeson County, the potential for Institute and cluster expansion is only limited by will and resources.

 

 

The Values-Based Curricula of the RCGLD Institute

 

There is a common theme in the CCA’s CORE Program values: “be ‘lovingly pro-active’ and ‘creatively strategic’ as opposed to ‘angrily re-active’ and ‘conventionally strategic.’”  Community change is demanding work but, with the right leadership, it can also be exciting, engaging, and connecting work.  CCA promotes the demonstration of loving, creative values for three main reasons: (1) there is significant cross-cultural evidence that this is the most effective way to do social action; (2) it is a proven way to attract others to engage in civic action; and (3) it brings balance and perspective into deliberations often dominated by confusion and conflict.  (Source: “Rationale for a Values-Based Curricula,” Center For Community Action).

 

 

       The Board of Directors of the Center For Community Action held three retreats over 1 ½1-½ years to lay the groundwork for the values-based curricula that is now used in the Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Institute. Led by Juan Sepulveda, CCA’s GLD consultant, the retreats were soul-searching, energizing, and deeply spiritual. The retreats were profoundly engaging and successful in meeting the Board’s goal of identifying, selecting, and framing the core values for the Institute curriculum and itstheir content.  Members raised many piercing questions regarding leadership values and responsibilities, such as:

 

“Now that we are at the table of power and influence and have more access to it, do we have the leaders we need to take advantage of these new opportunities?”

"What are the values of leadership and social justice that are important to us and how can we express, promote, infuse, and transfer them?"
 

Following the retreats, CCA staff typed up all of the content notes from the Board Retreats and designed curricula activities with the assistance of Bob Zuber, curriculum consultant, and Juan Sepulveda.  From 2000-2002, CCA Board and staff members also attended five Learning Institutes on Grassroots Leadership Development and four Curriculum Development Cluster Meetings that were facilitated by MDC in collaboration with the Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation. The development of the curricula included over 30 days of group meetings and over 90 days of research, planning, and writing during 2001-2002.

 

       A list of the values-based curriculum themes for each session of the Institute is listed below. 

 

 

 

Session 1 - Theme: The Importance of Values in Shaping our Vision, Knowledge, Leadership, and Action: CCA and the RCGLDI

Session 2 – Theme: Honesty That Heals

Session 3 – Theme: Empowerment – CCA’s Cluster Model

Session 4 – Theme: Leading With Integrity

Session 5 – Theme: The Roots and Use of Power

Session 6 -  Theme: Looking Both Ways: Preserving and Promoting History and Culture

Session 7 – Theme: Responsibility and Democracy

Session 8 – Theme: Respect – The Cornerstone of Effective Teamwork and Leadership

Session 9 – Theme: Social Justice - Balance, Equality, and Equity

Session 10- Theme: Spirituality and Social Action

Session 11- Theme: Reflection – The Power to See with the Mind and Heart

Session 12- Theme: Celebration - Graduation Program

 

The CORE Program values chosen by CCA’s Board of Directors are a combination of:

 

(1) Cross-cultural leadership values such as honesty, integrity, cultural preservation and promotion, respect, and celebration; and

 

(2) Social Justice leadership values such as power, empowerment, responsibility, democracy, equality, equity, social action, and reflection.

 

Leadership curriculum often emphasizes one or the other type of values.  CCA has taken its lead in developing a holistic set of values from the influence of traditional, indigenous cultures, including Native American, African, European, and Latin American. In traditional cultures, there is little no division between the individual and the social, and the personal and the political. These identities and responsibilities are all intertwined in the value of honoring and respecting the interdependence of all life.

 

In developing its set of cross-cultural and social justice values for the Institute, CCA developed a statement entitled: “Rationale for a Values-based Curricula.” The statement speaks to the meaning of values and why these values were chosen for CCA’s grassroots leadership development program.

 

“By ‘values,’ we don't mean abstract notions of social justice, grassroots organizing, or leadership. We mean ways and habits of life that are vital to fundamental, community and cultural transformation.”

 

The statement describes the needs for both the values being transferred on the Institute level and the skills being taught on the cluster level in this way:

 

“Creating the leadership base to effectively address community concerns takes more than issue expertise and cause-oriented skills – it takes an honest assessment and practice of the values that drive the search for credibility in the social justice field.  It takes people who honor commitments.  People who seek to understand more than to be understood.  It takes people who are dependable and fair.  It takes people who listen and seek to involve everyone is the conversation. It takes people who have an abiding faith, but not the kind that excludes the faith of others.  It also takes people who are not deceived about their own motivations and who strive to be consistent in the values that inform their community commitments”.

 

Curricula Activities and Values Development

 

Diverse learning methods and activities are employed to deliver the curricula content of the RCGLDI. The following quotes and stories illustrate the connections between the Institute’s curricula and values development among its membership.

 

“The Institute made me examine my own life and ask: “Is it all it could be?” Institute Member

 

“By listening and understanding each other we can become better leaders by seeing through the  same eye”  Institute Member

 

“ I have a deeper understanding and greater respect of difference”. People do things differently.  I have also learned that we can express opinions without being argumentative.” Institute Member

 

“I listen more now and I know more about the relationship between listening and talking”.   Institute Member

 

Honesty That Heals

 

“People often announce that they have something to say in meetings and then express their feelings in ways that are totally disrespectful of others. They call names, argue, and get angry, often when they become defensive. They say: “I’m just being honest!” and “Don’t take this personally”, then keep right on going. It totally disrupts the group and everybody is ready to go home.” Institute Member

 

There is honesty that heals and honesty that harms. There is honesty that restores relationships and honesty that destroys them. Session 2 of the RCGLDI focuses on the value of restorative honesty and utilizes discussion, presentation, and reflection to develop deeper understanding and effective skills to express honesty in a way that magnifies integrity and heals misunderstanding and relationships. In an exercise entitled: “Honestly Speaking”, Institute members write out two expressions of honesty in separate columns.  The Expressed Conversation is written in the right column and the Silent Conversation is written in the left column. Words in the right column demonstrate what you would say and words in the left column demonstrate what you would really want to say!  In groups of three, members take turns sharing their voices of honesty and discussing them with each other. Can some of the deeper feelings in the left column be expressed in the right column in a respectful manner? Are there words in the expressed column that need to be moved to the silent column out of respect for others and an understanding that another setting or time for sharing would be more appropriate?

To further assist with skills and concept development of “honesty that heals”,  Institute members are presented with a handout on “Filtering” during the large group discussion following the activity.  Filtering is described as the process of determining how best to express honesty in a group while: (1) honoring and respecting one’s own feelings; (2) honoring and respecting the feelings of others; and (3) focusing on a manner and content of speech that guides the group to a deeper level of understanding and moves the discussion forward, not backward or sideways. The image of an air and oil filter and their function are used as examples of this leadership ability. In the group discussion during Session 2, reflection turned to the will and skill needed to effectively filter one’s words without loosing respect for either oneself or for others. An elder called this a spiritual value and skill.

 

“Honesty that Heals is grounded in the principles of love, compassion, and kindness. It requires a new way of being: more intentional  requires a new way of being: more intentional in our speech and more loving in our outreach.” Source: RCGLDI Handout, Session 2

 

Roots and Use of Power

 

“What is the root of all power?” “What are the sources of power?” “In science, how many kingdoms (of power) are there on earth?” “What are some examples of nature’s power?” “What power do birds have?”  “What unique power do plants have?”  “What unique power does the mustard seed have?”  “How do bees communicate?” “What power do humans have?”  What responsibility do humans have in using their power in relation all other living beings?” “What power do our elders provide? Our ancestors provide?” How does diversity increase power in nature and culture?”  “How does the destruction of diversity in nature and culture decrease power? “What is the greatest power of all?” “How would you define empowerment?”

 

       These and other questions are a part of an interactive Icebreaker for Session 5 of the Grassroots Leadership Development Institute.  The handout comes with blanks to be filled by going around the room and talking with others and writing down answers. The Session proceeds with deep discussion of the questions and answers and the placement of the concept of power in the very essence of diversity in nature and culture that is bounded in and by spirit. Power is imaged as “that which influences” and Institute members deduce diverse types of power. The three sources of diverse power are discussed: spirit, nature, and humanity.  Seven stations of power are described and discussed as: place, individual, family, community, organizations and institutions, systems, and cultures. The curricula challenges the notion of power as “noun” and  object to “have”, “hold”, or “have not.”  Power is identified as a “verb”: as diverse influences that we all have and choose to use or not use each moment. Empowerment is presented as the process of developing influence that can occur in and from all of the stations of power.

 

“The more that all of these stations are empowering on many different levels,

the more empowered we will be in our lives.” Source: RCGLDI Handout, Session 5.

 

 

 

Perpetuating Our History and Culture

 

“I understand better that culture needs to be preserved or it will be lost,

that it is a basis for identification,andidentification, and a deciding factor in determining one’s behavior.Institute Member

“We are responsible to all other persons for the survival of our cultural spirit and the values and traditions through which our culture survives.  Through our extended families, we retain, teach, andliveand live our cultural way. With guidance and support from elders,we must teach our children our cultural values” 

Source: RCGLDI Handout, Session 6, Adapted from “Alaska Native Values for the Curriculum”, produced by the Alaska Native Knowledge Network.

 

       Session 6 includes interactive small group activities and large group discussions, including developing a historical timeline of your ones own community and defining and identifying ethnic cultural values and practices. The countywide Green Map Project and cluster-based mapping projects are illustrated as one strategy for perpetuating and promoting history and culture. The session ends with a “Go Around” in which each membersmember is invited to speak briefly and respond to the following question in 10 words or less. The question is written on newsprint and read to the group. The facilitator emphasized to everyone that the question has two parts and that you can’t use more than 10 words (or so) to answer the question.

 

“If you were leaving tomorrow on a trip to another country and could only take one cultural value with you, what would it be and how would you practice it?”

 

The Fable of the Fox and the Stork – A Discussion of Equality and Equity

 

       Each session of the Institute begins with small group activities that start as soon as three people enter the meeting. There is no waiting for everyone to arrive. Members that arrive on time or even early spend more time in their small group activities. Aesop’s Fable of the Fox and the Stork provides the basis for lively small group and large discussion on the meaning and distinctions between equality and equity at the beginning of Session 9. Written discussion questions are used to facilitate reflection in small groups. A brief summary of the fable follows. Given equal helpings of soup, the stork went hungry when it was served in a plate and the fox starved when it was served in a jug. Both the stork and the fox prepared food for themselves and each other and they were treating each other “equally”. The problem was that the fox did not treat the stork fairly. The stork, then, responded in kind to the fox. They treated each other equally (i.e. with equality) but not fairly (with equity).

 

Handouts on Equality and Equity are passed out after the Fable is fully interpreted and discussed by Institute members. More discussion follows. Specific examples of their differences in real-life situations are outlined. Examples of different types of “affirmative action” are discussed as strategies for equity in order to overcome inequality.  Following the large group discussion, Institute members return to their community cluster teams. They then identify and discuss issues of equality and equity in Robeson County and share their findings through reports to the large group. The session ends with a Go Around and response to this question: “Share one insight that you gained as a result of your participation in this session?”

 

       For many Institute members, this session on “Social Justice: Balance, Equality, and Equity” proved to be the most transformative in terms of developing a new perspective and conceptual framework related to social values and issues.

 

Respect: What Ddoes iIt Mean and How Do We Practice It?

 

“What does it mean to talk with respect?”  “What does it mean to be respectful of all group members in a meeting?” “What do you see in a group when group members are respectful of one another?”  “What are the indicators that respect is operating in a group meeting?”  “If two people begin arguing in one of your meetings, what would you do in s a respectful way to end the argument?”  What reason would you give for your action?”

 

       These questions and scenarios were presented as members walked in the door to

Session 8: Respect – The Cornerstone of Effective Teamwork and Leadership. Institute members wrote down their answers individually and then met in their community cluster teams for discussion. Following their small groups, each cluster team reported on their discussion and answers to the questions. The “Story of Two Birds” was passed out. Institute members divided into groups of two, read the story and discussed it. Briefly, the story goes like this. There were two birds, one sitting near the top of the tree and the other near the bottom. They argued over the color of the leaves on the tree based on what they saw.  The dilemma was that the tops of the leaves were green and the bottoms of the leaves were white.  It wasn’t until they came together and were about to fight that they looked up and realized that they were both right. With their partners, Institute members then developed “10 Principles of Respect” and shared them with the large group. The Session ended with a Go Around in which each Institute member answered this question in 10 words or less: “How will you improve your ability to be more respectful of others?”

 

“ I have a deeper understanding and greater respect of difference”. People do things differently.   “ I have also learned that we can express opinions without being argumentative.” Institute Member

 

“I have deeper insight and am more understanding of different opinions. I am able to better motivate others, open up easier, and am more tolerant of others.” Institute Member

 

“ Leaders must be diverse in thinking and recognize that other ways mabemay be better than theirs.” Institute Member

“I learned that good leaders respect all differences within the group or organization and allow input from everyone.  Institute Member

 

 

 

 

Community-Based Clusters

 

“CCA’s clusters are the life force and energy that fuel the organization”. Institute Member

 

One of the key elements in CCA's strategy to create change mechanisms that have longevity and impact is the development of membership cluster groups in which community residents of all ages and ethnic backgrounds meet together on a regular basis to assess their communities, evaluate local needs and talents, develop programs to deepen their knowledge, and create agendas for change. This process of identifying community needs and resources is of fundamental importance to the health and stability of the county, and cluster groups have helped people become agents of their own renewal, whether the issue was related to zoning, agriculture, environmental health, school quality, or the judicial system.  The clusters are community-based citizens groups where, working alongside CCA staff, members identify issues of importance to themselves and their families, research resources and options for change, and develop and implement local and countywide project plans.

 

Five communiltycommunity-based, membership clusters are active in the Maxton, Pembroke, Red Springs, Saddletree, and Lumberton areas of Robeson County. The three major activities of each cluster are:


1. Monthly cluster meetings focus on discussing community needs, problems and issues, identifying their root causes, and strategic planning. In their clusters, people speak their mind openly, identify specific rather than vague sources of concern, see beyond the most obvious sources of blame to some of the more structural and pervasive causes of economic and social problems in the County, and decide what to do.

2.Cluster members develop and implement short and long-term strategies to address community issues. Clusters are designed to be solution oriented, moving people as quickly as they are able from identification of problems to a strategic plan and implementation of solutions. Cluster members discuss various tactics for change and receive advice from other membership clusters and staff at the Institute meetings. Networking with organizations outside the county is utilized in order to collaborate on issues of policy that impact grassroots persons on a state, regional, and national level.

3. Participation in RCGLD Institute – 4 cluster members are elected to attend the Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Institute along with their cluster organizer.  Four new members are sent to the Institute each year.

 

Cluster members who successfully engage in our leadership trainingleadership-training program will beare equipped to perform multiple tasks to facilitate change in the County. Within their own community, they will generate and receive suggestions for local and County improvements, air concerns regarding the quality of life in their community, and decide strategies to meet community needs and solve community problems.. Within the County, cluster leaders will beare able to confidently and knowledgeably represent their community in conversations with County officials responsible for health care, infrastructure, law enforcement, education and other civic functions. Leaders will also better understand the mandates under which officials operate, the appropriate "channels" for pursuing grievances, the rights of citizens under the law, and the means by which laws and policies can be amended or displaced. Cluster leaders will beare able to advise County officials about local needs and concerns, enlist active support for policies that benefit local constituents and assume greater levels of responsibility for community and countywide planning, including the potential to run for public office. Their primary task, however, is to reinforce at all levels of policy that social services are no substitute for community-based analysis, education and action, and that the best judge of needs and solutions are the people who live amidst the problems and opportunities.

Cluster Activities and Community Development: Values Presented In Action

 

       CCA members presented the values represented in the curricula of the Grassroots Leadership Development Institute through organized action in their community cluster groups. Four examples of community development and policy leverage projects that were infused with Institute values are provided below.

 

Development of a Community Center in Saddletree

 

Saddletree is one of the oldest Lumbee communities in Robeson County and is home to the newest CCA membership cluster group. Magnolia School is a K-8 school that is located in the heart of Saddletree.  It is a community school that plays a vital role in the life and spirit of the people of Saddletree. The Institute provided the first major leadership training for its new grassroots leaders.  Members of the Saddletree Cluster Leadership Team learned how to facilitate empowerment processes and to achieve empowered outcomes.  As a result of participation in the Institute, Saddletree Cluster members worked with Magnolia School and the Robeson County Family Support Program to turn the Family Resource Center in the School’s Old Agricultural Building into a fully operational community and educational center with expanded programs for parents, children, and senior citizens. Now, the Saddletree Cluster Group will have a permanent place to meet and a base for diverse community programs and projects. Cluster members decided to work in collaboration with the Family Resource Center and chose youth leadership development and disability policy advocacy as two of its key issues.

 

       During Session 11 on “Reflection: The Power to See with the Mind and Heart”, Saddletree Members wrote and spoke:

 

“What I liked best about the Institute is learning to work together, developing leadership skills, and the fellowship with new friends”

 

“I have learned a lot about how to come together and get organized.  We have officers in our cluster and each has a job title, knows what they are to do, and does it.”

 

 “I learned that I need to choose people with values such as honesty and integrity.  I need to recruit people of action, people that are respectful of others, people who are willing to gain knowledge of a vision and accept the responsibility to put it into action.  We need people who are community oriented.”

 

       After their graduation from the Institute, Saddletree Cluster members completed work on the Community Center building in January, 2003.

 

County Governance Policy: The Red Springs Dilemma

 

“I learned that you can have equality without equity.I gained a better understanding of the definition of the two: equality means that  one has equal access and equity means equal treatment.  There are many situations in Robeson County where there is equal opportunity shown, but not equal treatment.”

 Institute Member

 

 

       Red Springs is the 2nd largest town in Robeson County with a majority African American population and a rapidly growing, Latino/Hispanic population. As a result of participation in the Grassroots Leadership Development Institute, Red Springs Cluster Members decided to implement a policy research, development, and advocacy project to review access to representation from the entire town of Red Springs on the two major elected Boards in Robeson County: the Board of Commissioners and the School Board. At the present time, Red Springs is split down the middle and has two School Board Districts and two County Commission districts that cover the East and West sides of the municipality and much larger territories and populations in the adjoining non-municipal areas. None of the four districts are predominately African American: two are predominately Native American and two are predominately European American. Consequently, there are two White and two Indian elected officials from these districts. Fortunately, one of the four – a School Board member – is from Red Springs. The question facing the African American community in Red Springs is: “How can we acquire electoral representation on these Boards?

 

       The issue of representation is more complex because the citizens in Robeson County engaged in a highly participatory, redistricting process and program during 1988-1992. Three campaigns successfully achieved equitable racial representation on the Board of Commissioners, the School Board, and in the N.C. Legislative Delegation for the first time in the history of the county. The Center For Community Action was a key partner in these efforts that included the merger of five, distinct school systems into one countywide system.  The problem for Red Springs is that there was no African American leadership at that time that strongly advocated for majority African American districts in these three governmental bodies to be developed in the Red Springs area. African American leaders in other communities of Robeson County successfully advocated to place the majority African American districts in their areas. Consequently, there are no School board or Board of Commissioners districts that unite all of Red Springs and provide an opportunity for an African American candidate to be successfulelected.

 

       During the course of the Institute, Red Springs Cluster members developed a plan to determine diverse options for representation, including running a candidate for an at-large seat on the School Board or requesting that the three remaining, at-large districts on the school board be eliminated and that Red Springs be united into one of three new single districts.   They utilized the “Relationship Mapping” Technique learned in Institute Session 7, entitled “Responsibility and Democracy”, to determine who they needed to consult regarding their concerns, options, and strategies. Cluster leaders drew a “Relationship Map” of leaders and who-knew-who and determined how to navigate and utilize the relationship networks among grassroots and professional leaders and advocates in order to build both their understanding and influence. Session 9, entitled: “Social Justice: Balance, Equality, and Equity”, provided Red Springs cluster leaders with the conceptual understanding of the difference between equality and equity and the support to move forward to acquire equitable representation for their highly populated, but under-represented, town.

 

“I have learned how to talk to people who talk to people that I can’t talk to.  For example,  Mr. _______ has a good relationship  with our town manager.  He can go and drink coffee all day with him, but I can’t.”     Institute Member

 

“I’ve learned that my way may not be the best way.”  Institute Member

I listen more now and I know more about the relationship

between listening and talking.”  Institute Member

 

“By listening and understanding each other we can become better leaders

by seeing through the same eye.”   Institute Member

 

“Love and compassion are the roots of justice.  If justice does not manifest love and compassion, then it is not just.”  Mac Legerton, Session 9 presentation

 

Perpetuating History and Culture: The Prospect Green Map

 

       Prospect is a large, rural Lumbee community that has retained a strong identity and culture, including its own ethno-English pattern of speech.  Its name is derived from Prospect Church that is at the center of the community and is the largest United Methodist, Native American congregation in the U.S.  As a result of participation in the Grassroots Leadership Development Institute, Members of the Prospect Cluster Group increased their knowledge and understanding of the importance of preserving and perpetuating their Native history and culture. During the course of the Institute, Prospect Cluster Members led the way for the county in publishing the first of over 70, community-based Green Maps in Robeson County. Working with CCA staff and the national and international Green Map System program, Prospect members have documented the environmental, historical, cultural, civic, and recreational sites and assets of their distinct community and created the first asset map of the natural and cultural resources of Prospect. The Prospect Green Map will be used as a model for all of the other community-based Green Maps being developed in Robeson County.

 

In the end, all of the local Green Maps will be combined into one Robeson County Green Map, a thorough compendium of the abundant natural and cultural resources that are unique to the county. From the Lumber/Lumbee River Watershed, its abundant and beautiful cypress swamplands, to the Carolina Bays, to its edible and medicinal plants, to its potters,  fishermen and women, drummers, musicians, and equestrians,  to the site of a major anti-Klan uprising, and to the places where Federal troops encamped while searching for Henry Berry Lowry,  Robeson County has a powerful biodiversity and cultural diversity that are its strongest assets and foundation for sustainable development. The Robeson County Green Maps will also provide "common texts" for residents seeking a more active role in planning and development decisions in the County.

 

 

During Session 11 of the Institute and during interviews on the Green Map Project, mapmakers wrote and spoke:

 

 “I learned the importance of preserving culture. I learned that culture is used as a basic form and tool of identification.  Culture can be a determining factor of one’s behavior.  I learned to be more acceptant of others people’s beliefs.”

 

        “We need people who stress values with a positive nature and can listen and reflect on their values in action.”

 

“Because of the Institute, we see a little better… We look at what supports us from the past and what is before us in the future and how to be the best among the brethren.”

 

Most people in our County don't seem to know much or even care much about the abundant treasures that exist around us, and thus are rarely inclined to nurture or protect them.  The failure of our adult leaders to value their local culture and environment guarantees that our children will most likely seek and find their futures elsewhere.”

 

       What are the stories and values of our elders that we need to share? What practices do we need to perpetuate? How can we organize more people to respect and promote our local treasures? How can we provide opportunities for our youth that will compel them to come back home and use their talents and skills in this place?” 

 

Through the national and international Green Map network, youth and adult members of the Prospect Community are meeting other people and learning about other communities and cultures throughout the nation and world. Following the publication of the Prospect Green Map, it was displayed and discussed at the first International Green Map Conference held in Bellagio, Italy in December 2002. 

 

 

Job Displacement and Immigrant Expansion: The Impact of Globalization in Robeson County

“The economic and social fabric of the county is literally falling apart.” Institute Member

       Throughout the first year of the Robeson County Grassroots Leadership Development Institute, an invisible but foreboding cloud hung over the county. It was discussed at every monthly session of the Institute.  There were these questions and more:

“What are we going to do?”; “How are people going to survive?”; “Why are all the Mexicans coming here?”; “Why do they send their money home instead of spending it here?”; “Why did our government not only let, but encourage, these companies to pack up and leave?”; and “Why don’t they get a union?”

       Robeson County lost 8,000 jobs between 1993 and 2003, more than any county in N.C. and perhaps the nation.  The federal government identified most of these jobs as NAFTA-related losses and thousands of unemployed residents now receive extended unemployment and re-training funds as their only household income. Just at the moment of great progress when the people in the most ethnically-diverse, rural county in the nation achieve equitable representation in governance and sit together for the first time at the tables of decision-making – the legs of those same tables are cut out from under them by a public policy far beyond their control.  The concept of economic dependence and the need for policy advocacy could not have been made any clearer. During the same time, state government promoted the development and construction of the Smithfield Hog plant, the largest meat packing plant in the world in neighboring Bladen County. Large-scale hog businesses invaded Eastern N.C. and Latin American immigrants were brought to work in the Smithfield plant, choosing to live in Robeson County because of its diverse population, availability of mobile homes, and close proximity. to the plant.

       Discussions regarding both the massive job loss and rising tensions with immigrants at the Institute sessions always ended with this question: “What can we do?” Strategies focused on starting a new project in CCA that would include research, community organizing, public policy and program development and advocacy, and recommendations to and negotiations with public and private sector leaders. Institute members agreed to select representatives from each cluster to serve on a Project Advisory Board. In September, 2002, the Robeson County Sustainable Communities Project was formed. A seed grant of $10,000 was received from the Public Samaritan Program of the Economic Justice Committee of the N.C. Council of Churches. Research on the economic and social impact of the massive job displacement is now underway. The strategies of community organizing and policy advocacy on the federal and state level will follow.

Conclusion

 

CCA has established values and dimensions of effective and successful grassroots leaders through its CORE Program.  The complementary systems of values and skills development demonstrated in the Institute and Cluster models provide new opportunities for grassroots leaders to broaden their leadership commitments and strengthen their leadership competencies at the same time.  It is these CORE Program values, properly developed and utilized, that will ensure that grassroots leaders develop in quality, quantity, influence, and recognition. More than all else, the presence of CORE Program values in action will result in significant improvements in the lives of people and communities in Robeson County, N.C. and, perhaps, be a model and inspiration for others beyond its borders.

 

 

For More Information on the Center For Community Action and its programs, contact:

 

 

Center For Community Action, P.O. Box 723, Lumberton, N.C. 28359

Telephone: 910-739-7851; Fax: 910-618-9839; email: cca@carolina.net