Jesus the Jewish Messiah:

The Gospel according to Matthew  

Much of the glory that the Gospel of Mark did not receive, as the original prototype gospel, was given to the Gospel of Matthew. Matthew was given pride of place as the first gospel, and the first book, in the New Testament, an honor which Matthew did not deserve. St. Augustine judged that Mark was Matthew's pedisequus (horse boy, squire) and breviator (abbreviator), and when Augustine spoke, Christianity listened. After all, unlike Mark, Matthew had fabulous Christmas stories and dramatic Easter stories, and Jesus had a lot of beautiful things to say, like the sermon on the mount, including the Lord's prayer, the golden rule, and the beatitudes.

The document known today as the Gospel of Matthew was supposed to have been written by Jesus' personal apostolic secretary, Levi, the educated, literate tax collector, but there is confusion among the Gospels about the name of this tax collector (click here and here). If Matthew was an eyewitness to Jesus--one of his twelve original apostles even--and if Mark was only a second-hand witness, then why would Matthew have to copy his narrative information from Mark? And if Mark was Matthew's abbreviator, why would Mark cut out Matthew's Christmas and Easter stories, eliminate all of Jesus' most beautiful and inspiring sayings listed above, and then go through and systematically corrupt Matthew's literary style and demote Jesus to being a sinful human who needed a baptism of repentance and forgiveness of his sins? Obviously these are vexing questions, and there are more, but the four-source hypothesis seems to answer most of them.

Read Carefully and Consider the Implications for our study:

Major Themes: , pp. 76-89

Learn the Key Terms on p. 120 with special reference to their original context in the chapter