Sociology of Deviant Behavior (Spring 2008)

 

Professor John Rice

Office: SBS 208D (962-7313; ricej@uncw.edu)

Course Web Page: http://www.uncw.edu/soccrj/about-faculty-rice.html

(Course page link at bottom of my department page)

Office Hours: MWF, 1:00-1:30; 3:00-3:30; MW, 5:00-5:30; R, 2:00-3:15

(and by appointment)

NOTE: If you prefer a PDF version of the syllabus, click here

 

I. Course Description

 

     Every society is organized according to someone's design. This design varies historically and cross-culturally, and the "designers" themselves are most often quite invisible. Nonetheless, a social order reflects someone's judgment that this, rather than another, is the way that things will be done. Social institutions both embody and reproduce this decision. From this decision, design, or judgment, then, the social category of "the deviant" is born.

     Deviance has been an inexhaustible subject of inquiry, as well as a major source of employment, not only for those who have made a "career" of their deviance but, among others, for the legal profession, the police, criminologists, penologists, psychologists, social workers, and, of course, sociologists. All have been concerned with the obvious questions: Why do people deviate? How can this be stopped? How can we keep them from doing it again? The Deviant, however, is not an unchanging social role: public attitudes change, becoming more "liberal," or more "conservative," more or less punitive, more or less "scientific," more or less "moralistic." Not surprisingly, this ebb and flow in how laws, norms, and sanctions are thought about is reflected in what is and is not considered deviant, in social control practices, and in the study of deviance. Broadly speaking, the sociological perspective has shifted its focus from asking why people deviate, to asking how they do so, and to who decides what is and is not deviant. These three orientations correspond with what we will call the naturalistic, the appreciative, and the critical approaches toward deviance, and the emergence of each new approach is grounded in and issues from larger societal, cultural, and historical changes. 

     This course will present an overview of these three approaches, in something of a rough chronological order. By the end of the semester, students will have been exposed to and will be expected to have a solid grasp on the major sociological perspectives on deviant behavior and, more importantly, they will learn that the study of those modes of personal conduct that a society relegates to the status of "outsiders" offers a vital glimpse into the nature of that society as a whole.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

II. Course Requirements/Texts

 

A. There will be two texts for the course:

 

            Classics of Criminology, 3rd edition, by Joseph E. Jacoby

            Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance, by Howard S. Becker

 

B. It will be possible to earn 100 total points in this course, which will be broken down by your scores on the following:

 

            1. An early-semester exam worth 25 points.

            2. A mid-term exam worth 25 points.

3. A term paper worth 15 points (3 of these points will be decided by a 3 to 4 page prospectus/draft, to be submitted early in the semester -- see below).

            4. A final exam worth 30 points.

5. Attendance and Participation: worth 5 points. A successful and enjoyable class depends to a significant degree upon the active intellectual involvement of both students and professor. Students are not simply receptacles into which teachers "pour" information, and learning involves the ability to actively engage – wrestle with, think through, challenge – the ideas presented in the class. I both encourage and expect that active intellectual involvement in my classes, and that involvement requires that students be present in class (both physically and mentally) and that they be prepared for the class.

a. In the interests of fairness, I start all student scores on this measure at 4 points (which is 80% of the total points you can earn for attendance/participation), and either add to or subtract from those points based upon your in-class performance. Points will be added for perfect or near-perfect (all but 1 or 2 classes) attendance, and for positive involvement in the life of the class; they will also be added in the event that – for those reluctant to actively participate in discussions – students take advantage of my office hours to clarify any points about which they are uncertain or interested. Points will be subtracted for excessive absences and/or late arrivals, and for being a negative presence in the class (disruptions, mentally absent). At the extremes, it is possible to earn all 5 points or to earn no points at all.

 

Exams will cover both lecture and reading material, with somewhat greater emphasis placed upon lecture material. The tests will comprise short answer, and short and long essay questions.

 

The prospectus/draft mentioned in #2, above, will be a 3-4 page, typed, double-spaced paper, describing: (1) the subject you have chosen to study; (2) the analytical approach you will be taking; and, (3) a complete list of some of the relevant references you will be using. I will provide you with more detailed specifications about a month into the semester. The prospectus/draft will be due in class on Monday, March 10th. Primarily, the prospectus/draft is one way of ensuring that you do not put in too much work on a paper that is too ambitious, not ambitious enough, too unfocused, or not appropriate for a sociological inquiry. The prospectus/ draft will be handed back to you, with detailed suggestions for improving your papers, early enough in the semester that you will have time to make changes or select a new topic if the need arises.

 

The term paper itself will be 8-10 pages (including the appropriate references and end-note sections). The content of the paper should develop a sociological analysis of some form of "deviance." The analysis may (AND MUST) employ any of the major sociological perspectives we will be covering during the semester. (I stress "sociological," because we will also devote some time to biological and psychological approaches, but, as this is a sociology course, I will expect a sociologically informed analysis.) There is, in short, a great deal of freedom involved in putting together your paper. The prospectus will help guarantee that that freedom does not become a form of suffering.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

III. Exam Dates, Absences, Late Papers, Grading.

 

A. The first exam will be given during regular class time on Friday, February 8th

 

B. The second exam will be given during regular class time on Wednesday, March 19th 

 

C. The Final Exam will be given on Wednesday, April 30th from 3:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.

 

D. You must notify me in advance if you have to miss an exam. If you do not, and you do not have a legitimate (e.g. emergency surgery) and provable excuse, you will not be allowed to make up the exam.

 

E. The Prospectus/draft, again, will be due during class time on March 10th. The Term Paper will be due on April 28th, at the beginning of the class period.

 

1. The requirements for turning in papers are the same as for excused absences from tests; you must check with me. Late Papers will be docked one letter grade for each day late, unless you have a legitimate excuse. 

 

F. Grades: Your Course Grades will be based upon a standard conversion of the total points you have earned into a corresponding letter grade. (Because you can earn 100 points, your scores are your percentages.)

 

A = 93 and above        B+ = 87-89      C+ = 77-79     D+ = 67-69     F = 59% or less

A- = 90-92                  B   = 83-86      C   = 73-76      D   = 63-66

                                    B-  = 80-82     C- = 70-72      D-  = 60-62

 

G. Cheating, Plagiarism: All work – tests, papers – must be the product of your own efforts. Any attempt by a student to represent the work of another as his or her own is considered plagiarism. Plagiarism includes copying the answers of another student on an examination or copying or substantially restating the work of another person or persons in any oral or written work without citing the appropriate source, and collaborating with someone else in an academic endeavor without acknowledging his or her contribution.

 

Pay close attention to this definition, because if you are guilty of plagiarism you will receive an “F” for the entire course. It is not difficult to tell when a term paper or exam has been plagiarized, and I do take the time and make the effort to apprehend cheaters. Academic dishonesty is nothing other than lying and stealing; if you choose to lie or steal you will be treated accordingly.

 

Course Outline

 

Part I. The Naturalistic Approach

Date

Topic and Readings

Jan. 9

Course Introduction

 

Readings:

  1. Course Syllabus and Outline
  2. http://www.salemweb.com/guide/witches.shtml

Jan. 11, 14

The Demonic Perspective

            Deviance as the work of the devil

 

Readings: Note: assigned readings are for the following week’s classes (so these readings are for the discussion of the classical perspective [below])        

        In Jacoby, Beccaria pp. 352-360; Bentham, pp. 105-108

NO CLASS JANUARY 21st: MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY

 

Jan. 16, 18, 23

The Classical Perspective

            Deviance as Rational and Intentional Individual Action

 

Readings:

            In Jacoby: Lombroso-Ferrero, pp. 141-156; Dugdale, pp. 157-164;
                   Goddard, pp. 165-171; Hooton, pp. 180-191

Jan. 25, 28, 30

The Bio- and Psycho-pathological Perspective

            Deviance as Irrational, Beyond Individual Control

            Lombroso

                        Sheldon

XYY syndrome, etc.

 

Readings:

In Jacoby: Shaw and McKay, pp. 19-25, 240-247; Sellin, pp. 235-239; Thrasher, pp. 4-8

Helpful additional info, not required:
     http://www.crimetheory.com/Soc1/Chic1.htm

    http://home.comcast.net/~ddemelo/crime/disorg.html

Feb. 1, 4, 6 

Urbanization and Social Disorganization

            Deviance as the Product of Rapid Social Change, Disorganization,

             & Cultural Conflict

Review                                                   

 

Feb. 8

                                   EXAM #1

 

Readings:

           In Jacoby:

        Durkheim, pp. 119-123

 

Feb. 11, 13, 15

Functionalism

         Deviance as a Necessary and Positive Part of Society

          Return, go over exams

 

Readings:

         In Jacoby: Durkheim, pp. 208-213; Merton, pp. 214-    

         223; Cohen, pp. 248-253; Cloward and Ohlin, pp. 283-287

 

Helpful, but not required:

http://www.crimetheory.com/Merton/index.html (Explanation of Merton’s version of Anomie) http://home.comcast.net/~ddemelo/crime/cohen.html (Cohen)

http://home.comcast.net/~ddemelo/crime/diff_opp.html (Cloward and Ohlin)

Feb. 18, 20, 22

Anomie

       Deviance as the product of normlessness and social strain

            Durkheim

            Merton

 

Readings:

           In Jacoby: Sutherland, pp. 272-275; Burgess and Akers, pp. 275-    

           282; Sykes and Matza, pp. 268-271; Hirschi, pp. 294-301

           In Outsiders (Becker): Chapter 3


Helpful, but not required:

http://home.comcast.net/~ddemelo/crime/hirschi.html (Hirschi’s Social       Bond Theory)

http://home.comcast.net/~ddemelo/crime/differ.html (Sutherland, Differential Association Theory)

http://home.comcast.net/~ddemelo/crime/sykes_matza.html (Sykes and Matza, “Techniques of Neutralization)

          

Feb. 25, 27, 29

Deviance as Learned Behavior

 

            Sutherland, "Differential Association"

             Hirschi, “The Social Bond”

            Sykes and Matza, "Techniques of Neutralization"

            Burgess and Akers, "Differential Reinforcement"

 

NO CLASS, Week of March 1st – SPRING BREAK!!

Part II: The Appreciative Approach

 

Readings:

         In Jacoby: Tannenbaum, pp. 312-313; Lemert, pp. 314-316

         In Outsiders (Becker): Chapters 1and 2

 

(NB: Term Paper Draft Due, March 10th)

Mar. 10, 12

Labeling and Social Constructionism

         Theoretical Background:

               Phenomenology, Ethnomethodology, Symbolic Interactionism

         Becoming Deviant

 

Readings:

         In Outsiders (Becker): Chapters 7 and 8

 

Mar. 14, 17

Creating Labels:

         "Banning," Moral Entrepreneurialism and Moral Crusades

          The Marijuana Tax Act

Review

          

 

Mar. 19

                               EXAM #2

Readings:  

         In Jacoby: Skolnick, pp. 419-432; Black and Reiss, pp. 433-439

NO CLASS MARCH 21st: STATE HOLIDAY

Mar. 24, 26, 28, 31, Apr. 2, 4

Return, go over exams

Applying the Labels:

        Contingencies, Counting Deviance, and Status Degradation

        Child Predators

 

Readings:

        In Jacoby: Clemmer, pp. 506-510; Sykes, pp. 511-520

Apr. 7, 9, 11, 14

Consequences of the Label:        

        Stigma, Deviance Amplification, and the Reorganization of  Identity

 

Readings:

        In Jacoby: Marx, pp. 124-130; Quinney, pp. 131-140; Chambliss,   pp.  381-390

      Helpful, but not required: http://www.sociology.org.uk/devtmarx.doc      

      Scroll down: Pp. 10-end)

 

Part III: The Critical Approach

Apr. 16, 18, 21

Beyond Labeling Theory:

      Criticisms of the Interactionist View

     Conflict Theory and The Political Economy of Deviance

 

Readings: Conrad and Schneider – “Medicalization” (Click for link to PDF file of this article)

 

Apr. 23, 25, 28

The Political Economy of Deviance: Professionalization and Medicalization

 

Last Day of Class: Wrap up and Review

(NB: TERM PAPERS DUE IN CLASS, April 28)

Wednesday April 30th: Final Exam, 3:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.

 

 

Back to Main Course Page