Applying the Analytical Framework

Co-Dependency as a Cultural Product: A Discourse

Context

Societal, Cultural, Historical:

*      The Baby Boom & the Counter-Culture

*      Affluence (for many; not all) & Education

*      Extremely high expectations for society

*      1960s – 1970s: rejecting conventional social institutions (not measuring up to cultural value

*      Civil Rights & Anti-War movements

*      By late 70s – early 80s, public & political à private & therapeutic

*      The Triumph of the Therapeutic (Philip Rieff)

*      Pyschotherapeutic discourse & the therapeutic revolution

*      From ethic of self-denial to ethic of self-actualization

*      Assumptions about human nature, culture/society, & the right relationship between self and society

*      Liberation psychotherapy (4 core assumptions)

*      Human nature is intrisically good (positive, constructive)

*      Repression of self is the cause of all psychological sickness

*      Psychological sickness, in the aggregate, is the cause of societal problems

*      Therefore, to be well, the self must be free from external (cultural & societal) control

*      Transforming social institutions to align with new values

*      Culture ßà Social Structure

*      Marriage/Family; Religion; Education

 

Institutional/Organizational:

*      The Addiction Treatment Industry

*      Legislation legitimated the disease model of alcoholism

*      Created the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

*      Insurance coverage offered for treatment

*      Hundreds of treatment facilities nationwide

*      The 12-step subculture

*      Alcoholics Anonymous

*      Support groups for Families (Al-Anon; Ala-Teen)

*      Dozens of other Anonymous groups formed

*      Recovery Bookstores

Action Strategies:

*      Disseminate information via as many public venues as possible

*      Adopt & implement rhetorical styles for discourse that call for public outrage and urgency (see “Content”)

Process

Production:

*      TV: Oprah, Phil, Geraldo, Sally Jessie, etc. & PBS (Bradshaw)

*      Books (and book sales in the multi-millions), meetings/groups

Selection:

*      The advocates had selected the themes and images with which to construct the product

*      The public (& the media) had selected the discourse, each for their own purposes

Institutionalization:

*      It had begun to take on organizational & institutional form (by late 1980s—early 1990s)

*      Co-Dependents Anonymous Groups

*      Those identifying themselves as co-dependents

Content

Social Horizon:

*      Depiction of societal and cultural conditions

*      Repressive “mainstream” society/culture

*      “Poisonous pedagogy” (Bradshaw)

·        “Shaming” child-rearing rules

·        “Abandonment” and “abuse” of children

*      These are normative socialization practices, the advocates contend

*      Depiction & empirical conditions (see, “Context,” above) do not match

*      But depiction does articulate with liberation therapy’s core assumptions

Discursive Field:

*      Binary opposition: what “is” (repressive mainstream culture) and “what should be”

*      The child as symbol

*      The “inner (divine) child” vs. mainstream culture’s “toxicity”

*      The normal vs. the deviant

*      Good vs. bad

*      Self-actualization vs. Self-denial

Figural Actions:

*      Adherents must “get into recovery”

*      Convert, join a group, re-conceptualize identity

*      “Detachment”

*      “Have a love affair with yourself”

 

 

Back to Main Page