University
of North Carolina at Wilmington |
|||
Course
Information |
|||
Professor: Rick Olsen |
Office: 231 Lakeside Hall |
||
Phone: 962-3710 |
Office Hours: 11-11:50 MWF and 10-11:30 TR
Feel free to drop by or schedule an appointment.
|
||
Email: olsenr@uncw.edu |
|||
Class Time: MW 3:00-4:15 |
Class Location: LH 141 |
||
Course Completion and Gateway Requirements: Classes typically coded “COM Majors ONLY” may occasionally be opened to PCOM majors or all students. This may most commonly occur during Summer terms. Please be aware, however, that to become a full-status COM major, you MUST complete the gateway courses (COM 105 and COM 200) SUCCESSFULLY, i.e., with a grade of “B” or higher in each. If you do NOT successfully complete those two courses, you cannot earn full COM major status, even if you complete one or more COM classes apart from the gateway courses.
Course Description
Studying that
process in its various manifestations can improve our ability to succeed at
work, participate in civic endeavors and critically consume the messages of
others.
Class Culture. Your
active participation is essential for this class to work.
Please come in with questions from the readings: What does it mean? What does it look like?
How does it apply? How do we
do it? These are all good questions
and will help make the class meaningful for you.
You will also be engaging in some writing outside of class that will help
foster class discussion. The more
you come prepared with questions, examples and issues, the less I’ll lecture.
Course
Objectives
This course is intended to:
1.
enhance awareness of the rhetorical dimensions of social reality and the
issues raised by these dimension;
2.
provide students with tools to assist in the study and critique of
rhetorical artifacts;
3.
promote application of these tools and concepts through the critical
construction and analysis of symbolic activity and artifacts.
4.
increase critical thinking and enable you to become a critical consumer
of rhetoric and culture
5.
improve your writing ability through descriptive and critical essays
Course
Competencies
After completing this course the successful student will be able to:
1.
demonstrate familiarity with major approaches to rhetorical criticism;
2.
identify worthy problem statements/research topics in a scholarly manner;
3.
apply course vocabulary in the examination of rhetorical activities and
artifacts.
“The only life that is worth living is the life of effort, the life of
effort to attain what is worth striving for” Theodore Roosevelt May 24th 1904
Course
Policies
Attendance. You are
expected to attend every class period. However,
since life happens, you are allowed two “personal days.”
Use them wisely if at all.
Number
of Absences Recorded |
Highest
Grade You Can Earn (regardless of grades earned on assignments) |
No
absences up to two absences |
A |
Three
or four absences |
B |
Five Absences |
C |
Six
absences |
D |
More
than six |
F |
If
you are planning to miss more than six classes go ahead and drop now please.
If you must be absent, handle it responsibly: communicate me and other
classmates so that you are prepared for the next class session.
Participation. There
is no formal class participation grade. However,
your participation in class discussion and activities as well as your attendance
may influence the assignment of a plus or minus to your final grade. Absenteeism, tardiness, sleeping and apathy will negatively
impact your grade.
Assignments. All work
must be handed in on time unless prior
arrangements have been made. No make-ups will be given unless there are extreme
circumstances—and such circumstances are handled responsibly by the student. Do not wait until you are out of school to begin behaving
professionally.
Honor
Code and Academic Statement
“It shall be the responsibility of every faculty
member, student, administrator and staff member of the university community to
uphold and maintain the academic standards and integrity of the University of
North Carolina at Wilmington” (1997-1998
Student Handbook and Code of Student Life, p. 91).
All student work and conduct must be in accordance with the academic
honor code and other codes informing the university community.
In choosing UNCW, you have become part of our community of scholars. We recognize that the UNCW learning experience is challenging and requires hard work. It also requires a commitment to make time available to do that hard work. The University expects you to make academics your highest priority by dedicating your time and energy to training your mind and acquiring knowledge. Academic success in critical thinking and problem solving prepares you for the changes and challenges you will encounter in the future. Our faculty and academic support resources are readily available as partners in this effort, but the primary responsibility for learning is yours.
Required
Text
Foss, S. K. (1996). Rhetorical
criticism: Exploration and practice (2nd ed.).
Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
There may also
be readings on reserve in the library and independent readings for your own
course projects
Assignments
and Grading: There
are 400 points available for the course. I
will be using a modified plus/minus system.
92% (460 pts.) and above is an A. 90-91%
is an A minus. 87-89% (435 pts.) is
a B plus, 84-86% is a B, 80-83% (400 pts.) is a B minus.
77-79% (385 pts.) is a C+, 74-76% is a C and 70-73% (350 pts.) is a C-.
You should keep up with your final grade by dividing the points available
so far by the points you’ve earned. The
result will be a number corresponding to your percentage.
For instance, after three graded probes, you have had the opportunity to
earn 75 points. Let’s assume your
actual scores add up to 66. When
you divide 66 by 75, you get .88 which is a B-plus.
The assignments are as follows:
Schedule
of Sessions
Be prepared for class. I reserve the right to dismiss students who are habitually unprepared for class. Actively read the material and come with questions, connections and examples.
Date |
Homework
Due |
Class
Session |
|
Weds. 8-21 |
Welcome Back! |
Course introduction and video |
|
Mon. 8-26 |
Chapter One |
What is rhetorical criticism |
|
8-28 |
Chapter Two |
Doing rhetorical criticism |
|
Labor Day—No Class |
|||
Wed. 9-4 |
Study for Quiz on chapters 1-3 Chapter Three |
Quiz OneNeo-classical criticism |
|
Mon. 9-9 |
Finish critical essay number one |
Critical Essay #1 dueDiscuss critical essay number one Neo-formalism and writing the critical essay |
|
9-11 |
Chapter Four |
Cluster criticism
|
|
Mon. 9-16 |
Study for quiz: this quiz includes question on the syllabus! |
Quiz Two (Chapter four and SYLLABUS!)
Semiotics as a critical tool
|
|
9-18 |
Chapter Five |
Fantasy theme criticism
|
|
Mon. 9-23 |
Study for quiz |
Quiz Three
The role of values in analysis |
|
9-25 |
Chapter Six |
Feminist criticism
|
|
Mon. 9-30 |
Study for quiz |
Quiz FourThe challenge of interpretation |
|
10-2 |
Finish critical essay number two Chapter Seven |
Critical Essay #2 Due
Generic criticism
|
|
Mon. 10-7 |
Study for quiz |
Quiz Five
Genre case study: apologia
|
|
10-9 |
Chapter Eight |
Ideological Criticism
|
|
Mon. 10-14 |
Study for quiz |
Quiz Six
Symbols and Power |
|
10-16 |
Chapter Nine |
Metaphoric Criticism
|
|
Mon. 10-21 |
Study for quiz |
Quiz SevenMetaphor case study
|
|
10-23 |
Chapter Ten |
Narrative criticism
|
|
Mon. 10-28 |
|
Quiz Eight
Narrative paradigm |
|
10-30 |
Chapter Eleven |
Pentadic criticism
|
|
Mon. 11-4 |
|
Team up with two other people in
class. Exchange drafts of Critical
Essay #3.
Critique the drafts orally and by writing comments in the margins.
A final draft along with rough drafts with comments should
be stapled together and put in the box outside my office door by 4
pm Tuesday 11-5
|
|
11-6 |
|
Quiz NineMore on Burke
|
|
Mon. 11-11 |
|
In-class workshop in final projects
|
|
11-13 |
Chapter 12 |
Generative Criticism
|
|
Mon. 11-18 |
|
Quiz TenCase study: SUVs
|
|
11-20 |
|
Multi-method critique and a continuum
|
|
11-25 |
|
TBA
|
|
Thanksgiving
Break—Go and be thankful
|
|||
Mon. 12-2 through final exam on Thurs. 12-19 from 11:30-2:30 |
Prepare final paper and presentation. Actively listen and ask questions. |
Presentations of final projects:
Remember these should be very polished presentations!
Strictly adhere to time limits, integrate appropriate media, and
involve us. Make class
worthwhile to come to! Papers
are due within 24 hours of presentation unless you go on exam day.
|
|
Course Assignments
Assignment |
Point
Value |
Three
Critical Essays |
75
points (3 X 25 points each) |
Ten
Quizzes on Readings |
200
points (10 at 20 points each) |
Final
Presentation |
25
points |
Final
Paper |
100
points |
All work, unless otherwise noted, must be typed and adhere to the APA style guide. Writing clearly and error-free is a big part of your success in this class—mange your time accordingly!
I reserve the right to modify the schedule and assignments as needed.
Assignment Descriptions
Portfolio Artifacts: One of the culminating experiences of a communication studies degree is the completion of COM 490 Discipline Capstone, a course that may include the preparation of a personal portfolio to organize and showcase your abilities. I encourage you to retain items from this class, whether produced independently or in groups, for inclusion as portfolio artifacts. Beyond the Capstone class, your portfolio may prove a valuable tool as you seek entry into a graduate program or employment in your areas of specialization.
I offer this
overview of assignments all at once not to overwhelm you but so that you can
manage your time accordingly. I
realize that this is not the only course you are taking and want you to be able
to take the lead in owning your education and managing your coursework. If
you have questions about any of these assignments be sure to ask them.
Really, go ahead and ask.
Quizzes—100
points
I have found that discussion goes better when
everyone has read the book. To
strongly encourage that behavior we will have ten quizzes that quickly assess
whether you have done the reading or not. The
quizzes are not designed to be tricky—though some material is hard—but to
reward you for actively reading the text. Some
of the exam questions will be taken directly from the quizzes.
As Mark Twain has said, “The man who does not read has no advantage
over the man that cannot read.”
“One
way to define criticism succinctly would be as the systematic process of
illuminating and evaluating the products of human activity . . . .The critic
of rhetoric focuses his or her attention on human efforts to influence human
thought and action.”
James R. Andrews, Michael
C. Leff and Robert Terrill. Reading Rhetorical Texts.
Critical
Essays
We will be learning specific vocabulary that function
a lot like tools in a woodworker’s shop or in the hands of a trained
physician. However, we must
practice using these tools. To do
so we must think critically and write clearly and persuasively. You will write three critical essays defined below which may
be independent of your term project or perhaps be an initial effort toward the
final project. The key is to use
these essays to refine your thinking and writing skills and your ability to use
the concepts of the course to assist your efforts at both of these endeavors!
The concepts should take you places in your thinking and writing that you
otherwise would not have gotten to.
1)
Essay One: You will take the
tools that emerge from the neo classical scholarship and use them to analyze a
piece of traditional public address. This
speech should come from Vital Speeches of the Day or perhaps the Great
Speeches video collection. I
must approve the artifact prior to your analysis.
It should be 3-5 pages and incorporate 1-2 sources on the artifact and
the method/concept that is central to your analysis.
2)
Essay Two: We live an
increasingly visual culture. This
essay requires that you analyze a predominantly visual artifact such as an
advertisement or building, or perhaps even the interior of a store or restaurant
for its rhetorical dimensions. You
must make specific use of one or more of the rhetorical approaches we will have
discussed in your analysis. It
should be 3-5 pages and incorporate 3-4 sources on the artifact and
method/concept that is central to your analysis.
3)
Essay Three: Film and TV have
significant influence on our culture and are often significant expressions of
our culture. You must analyze a
film that makes an argument using one or more of the methods we’ve discussed.
You may not use a method you have used in your previous essays.
It should be 3-5 pages and incorporate 3-4 sources on the artifact and
method/concept that is central to your analysis.
Final
Paper—100 points
This
paper should be 10-12 pages of very polished writing.
I highly recommend that you share your drafts with one another, with the
Writing Center, or anyone else you trust as an editor/proof reader.
This is a term project, not a
weekend project and will be graded accordingly.
A minimum of 12 quality sources
should be integrated into your paper and cited appropriately according to APA
style.
Your
paper should make a discernible argument and not simply offer a collection of information.
Take a stand, clarify it and defend it.
Hint: START THINKING SOON about this project.
You will analyze a significant artifact using concepts raised in the
course. You may analyze artifacts
from a special interest group such as PETA, Operation Rescue, Promise Keepers.
You may choose to analyze a significant ad campaign.
You may analyze single artifacts, for example: Bill Gates’ book on
technology, any of the Aliens movies, a specific piece of architecture or a speech or
speaker you find noteworthy from Vital
Speeches, the Great Speeches
videos or similar sources. Your
essay should include analysis of both intrinsic and extrinsic features
and factors.
The
paper should make clear and specific application of course concepts to the
analysis of your artifact. For instance, if you
decide that metaphors are a key feature of the artifact, then discuss metaphors
briefly, cite sources that help your reader understand how you are using
metaphors, and offer some analysis of the metaphors in the artifact.
Let’s Enjoy the Pursuit of Excellence
Together.