|
COURSE REQUIREMENTS & LIST OF TOPICS |
||
|
Honor Code |
Disability | Requirements |
| Expectations | Course Content | Grading |
|
Writing Abstracts |
||
| Archaeological Project | ||

Dr. John W. Myers
Associate Professor of Art History
Department of Art and Theatre, The University of North
Carolina At Wilmington
| Personal Information |
|
Professor: John W. Myers, Associate Professor |
|
Office Phone: 910-962-7962 (only during office hours). I may also be reached at home (see number below). |
|
Office: Cultural Arts Building (CA 2010) |
|
Home Phone: 910-395-5190 (NOT AFTER 9:00 PM, PLEASE) |
|
Office Hours: TUES AND THURS. 10:45-11:30 am, or by appointment. If you wish an appointment, please see me before or after class. |
|
Email address: (myersj@uncwil.edu) [on campus just: (myersj) will get you there]. I encourage you to communicate via E-Mail. I check my mail several times daily. You may get a quicker answer to your questions this way. |
| ~ACADEMIC HONOR CODE~ |
| "The University of North Carolina at Wilmington is committed to the proposition that the pursuit of truth requires the presence of honesty among all involved. It is therefore this institution’s stated policy that no form of dishonesty among its faculty or students will be tolerated. Although all members of the university community are encouraged to report occurrences of dishonesty, each individual is principally responsible for his or her own honesty." (Above is an excerpt from the "Student Code of Life" in the UNCW Student Handbook. All students are encouraged to read all of section V, "Academic Honor Code" for definitions of plagiarism, bribery, and cheating; and the procedures for reporting and adjudication of any activities involving student dishonesty). |
| As course instructor I will strive to make appropriate accommodations for students with disabilities, as specified in federal regulations. If you have a disability and need accommodation, please follow this procedure. First, contact and register with the office of Disability Services in Westside Hall (x3746). Second, obtain a copy of your accommodation letter, and then make arrangements to speak with me. Assistance will gladly be provided based on the recommendations of Disability Services and our mutual agreement. |
| Course Content:
A study of Ancient Greek art in a historical and cultural context to provide the student with an understanding of the interrelationship of art and culture in the ancient Greek world. |
| Methods:
A combination of lecture and discussion combined with readings in art, architecture, and ancient Greek literature. Your questions and participation in discussion, which require regular attendance at the lectures, are essential to the success of the course. Although not strictly in a seminar format, both interaction between professor and student, and student generated discussion are important. |
| Requirements:
Back to Top
1. Attendance Lecture attendance is mandatory because of the visual nature of much of the course, and the fact that class discussion may be part of any particular meeting. You may miss up two lectures during the semester without penalty. Those two absences are best saved for times of illness, emergency, or other legitimate reasons which may be discussed with me. Whenever possible, any absence should be discussed in advance with me. Attendance will be taken at the beginning of each class period. You are strongly encouraged to arrive promptly for the start of class. Consistent tardiness may translate into one or more full absences. Three percentage points per unresolved absence [beyond those allowed] will be deducted from the final grade (e.g.: If the final grade is 86% and there are three unexcused absences, the percentage will be adjusted downward to 77%). 2. Written Assignments A series of three (3) summaries or "Abstracts" to be chosen in consultation with the professor. Guidelines on a separate handout. [75 points] 3. Midterm Exam An exam consisting of identification of works of art, objective questions, and essays testing the material of the first half of the semester [100 points] 4. Archaeological Research Project (with written explanation) [100 points] An exhibition on some aspect of Ancient Greek art to be chosen in consultation with the professor. Details are outlined in the section on "Assignments." |
|
Point Value Percentage of Total Grade Class Attendance
0-?
Percentage points deducted from final average |
|
FINAL EXAMINATION DATE |
|
CALENDAR OF TOPICS AND ASSIGNMENTS |
|
DATE |
TOPIC |
ASSIGNMENT |
| WEEK
ONE: Thursday, 10 January |
Intro. to Syllabus and Requirements | No reading assignment |
| WEEK TWO: | ||
| Tuesday, 15 January | Discussion of Pedley Introduction | Pedley, 11-29 |
| Thursday, 17 January | The Aegean: Early Bronze Age | Pedley, 31-44 |
| WEEK THREE: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 22 January | The Aegean: Middle Bronze Age | Pedley, 45-61 |
| Thursday, 24 January | The Aegean: Late Bronze Age | Pedley, 63-87 |
| WEEK FOUR: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 29 January | The Aegean: Late Bronze Age (cont.) | Pedley, 88-103 |
| Thursday, 31 January | VIDEO: Crete and Mycenae | No Assignment First Abstract Due |
| WEEK FIVE: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 5 February | The Dark Ages & Geometric Greece | Pedley, 105-123 |
| Thursday, 7 February | The Orientalizing Period | Pedley, 125-134 (up to "Architecture") |
| WEEK SIX: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 12 February | The Orientalizing Period (cont.) | Pedley,
134-149 |
| Thursday, 14 February | VIDEO: "The Light of the Gods | No Assignment |
| WEEK SEVEN: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 19 February | Catch-up and Review | No Assignment |
| Thursday, 21 February | MIDTERM EXAMINATION | Material covered: Aegean thru Orientalizing |
| WEEK EIGHT: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 26 February | Archaic Art | Pedley, 151-173 (up to "Athens") |
| Thursday, 28 February | Archaic Art (cont.): Athens | Pedley, 173-192 (up to "Pottery") |
| 1 March -- 9 March |
SPRING BREAK |
No Assignments |
| WEEK NINE: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 11 March | Archaic Art (cont.) | Pedley, 192-209 Second Abstract Due |
| Thursday, 13 March | The Period of Transition | Pedley, 211--228 (up to "Sculpture") |
| WEEK TEN: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 18 March | The Period of Transition (cont.): Athens | Pedley, 228-247 |
| Thursday, 20 March | EASTER BREAK | NO CLASS |
| WEEK ELEVEN: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 25 March | VIDEO: "The Greek Temple" | No Assignment |
| Thursday, 27 March |
The High Classical Period I |
Pedley, 249-274 (up to "Sicily") |
| WEEK TWELVE: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 1 April | The High Classical Period II | Pedley, 274-287 |
| Thursday, 3 April | The High Classical Period III | no assignment |
| WEEK THIRTEEN: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 8 April | VIDEO: "In Search of Meaning" | No Assignment Third Abstract Due |
| Thursday, 10 April | The Fourth Century | Pedley, 289-304 |
| WEEK FOURTEEN: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 15 April | The Fourth Century (cont.) | Pedley, 304-335 |
| Thursday, 17 April | The Hellenistic Period I | Pedley, 337-350 |
| WEEK FIFTEEN: Top | ||
| Tuesday, 22 April |
The Hellenistic Period II |
Pedley, 350-387 |
| Thursday, 24 April | Catch-up and Review | No Assignment |
| WEEK SIXTEEN: Top | ||
|
Final Exam : Tuesday, May 6, 8:00-11:00 AM, CA 2030 (Project Presentation)
|
||
| What are Abstracts? An abstract is a concise summary of a larger document – thesis, essay, book, research report, journal publication, etc. – that highlights major points covered in the work, concisely describes the content and scope of the writing, identifies the methodology used, and identifies the findings, conclusions, or Why are Abstracts so Important? For research purposes, an abstract makes it possible for readers to quickly determine the content of a work and decide if the full text should be consulted. With published materials such as journal articles, abstracts are also important tools in an electronic search, based on key words from the body of the text and highlighted in an abstract. For the purposes of this course, a well-written abstract helps others, who may not be studying in your discipline, understand the purpose and value of your work; it should be comprehensible on a basic level to the educated non-expert. Qualities of a Good Abstract: Uses one or more well-developed paragraphs that are coherent, concise, unified, and able to stand alone; • uses an introduction/body/conclusion structure which presents the work’s purpose, methods, results, and conclusions (preferably in that order); • strictly follows the chronology of the work; • provides logical connections/transitions between the information included; • adds no new information, but simply offers a summary; • is understandable to a wide audience Steps for Writing Effective Abstracts: I. Review the article. Look for the following main parts of the work: purpose (thesis), methods, scope, results, conclusions, and recommendations. • Use the headings, outline heads, and table of contents to guide your abstract writing. II. After you’ve finished rereading, write a rough draft without looking back through the article. A. Make the abstract easy to read. Use the past tense when describing what was done. However, where appropriate use active verbs rather than passive verbs. • Use short sentences, but vary sentence structure to avoid choppiness. • Use complete sentences. Don’t omit articles or other small words in order to save space. • Avoid jargon. Jargon is the special vocabulary of a trade or profession used for communicating within that specific field. Jargon should be reserved for a specific, technical audience. An example of jargon: The VDTs in composition were down last week. Revised for general audience: The video display terminals were down last week. • For art historical work, use the names and terms specific to the discipline. Use the same tone and emphasis used in the original. • Generally, an abstract is easier to read when the thesis or purpose statement is first or at least, near the beginning of the abstract. B. Be Concise! • Don’t just copy key sentences from the article; you will end up putting in too much or too little information. • Don’t rely on the way material was phrased in the article; summarize the information in a new way. • Avoid repeating information given in the title. • Give the information only once. • Use standard abbreviations. • Be exact and unambiguous. III. Revise your rough draft! • Correct weaknesses in organization. • Improve transitions. • Drop unnecessary information. • Add important information you may have left out. • Eliminate wordiness. • Fix errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. * Print your final copy before submitting it, and read it again (and aloud) to catch any errors you missed. Important Points to Remember: • Do not comment on or evaluate the article. An abstract is not a review or opinion piece. Works Consulted: LEO Writing Abstracts, ©1995, ‘96, ‘97, ’98 The Write Place; Writer’s Workshop, University of Illinois, Urbana, adapted by Kitty O. Locker, 1997. *Adapted from the Fifth Annual Undergraduate Research Symposium – May 17th, 2002 Undergraduate Research Program. Also may consult following website: http://leo.stcloudstate.edu/bizwrite/abstracts.html |
||
|
You are an archaeologist living in the 3rd Millenium CE (Common Era). Your specialty is the late 20th century and you have been excavating at a particular site (your choice) in the ancient nation of the United States of America. Although you are an expert in the dominant ancient language of the period, Angliche, there are only a few documents which can be directly connected to the site or object which you have unearthed. So, you have had to develop your own theory about the function or use of the site or object you are working on with only a limited knowledge of its original context. Now it is time to present your findings to an august body of your peers in the Society of Archaeologists for an Understanding of Pre-Apocalyptic Culture. To prepare for your presentation, your task includes the following steps: 1. Choose a site, an object or group of related objects such as a building, complex, common object(s) with which you are familiar, but which might be interpreted differently by a scholar of the 3rd millenium. The idea is to be inventive with your explanation of the purpose or function of your artifact, but make it archaeologically plausible. It will be hard for your actual audience (the class) to take any interpretation seriously which differs from the actual use of the object they have known all of their lives, but it is your job to be serious and convincing. (For inspiration see: David MacCaulay, The Motel of Mysteries [NC1429.M15 A4 1978] or Great Moments in Architecture[PN6231.C46 M3], on reserve in Randall Library ). Hint: By the time you are ready to do this, you will have some knowledge of proper archaeological terminology and process to help you make your case. 2. Produce a ground plan, elevation, reconstruction, model of the "ruined" structure or object(s) and write a two-three page (typewritten) description which explains your theory of its original use in pre-apocalyptic U.S. culture. Ultimately, you will show your project and present your findings to the class. You may do this by reading your paper or using notes. Everyone will have at least one conference with me to get started and to answer any questions, but, as the foremost scholar in the field, I will be your resource throughout the semester whenever you need to consult. 3. Order of presentation will be determined by drawing time from a hat. The length of the presentation is five (5) minutes. After your presentation, you will turn in your project and the typed description. [100 points] |
||