|
|
MIT
598: Electronic Portfolio Development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What Should be Included in a E-Portfolio? Design & Development Procedures
Roles and responsibilities of faculty supervising the E-portfolio |
|
|
Context |
|
|
Conditions
|
|
|
Scope |
|
|
Role |
|
Present
the annotations consistently
Annotations should appear in a consistent format throughout the e-portfolio
so they are easy to find and scan through. Placing the annotations on
colored paper (light blue, beige, gray, or some other unobtrusive color)
helps distinguish them from the rest of the e-portfolio's contents, and
establish a baseline "look" for the e-portfolio.
Rationale
for Including the Artifacts/Products
The student is advised to select work that is relevant to his/her professional goals. No matter how great a project was, it shouldn't be represented in the student’s e-portfolio unless it is relevant to his/her professional goals. The student should not assume that the relationship between the included work and his/her professional goals are clear to the reader. He/she should explain these relationships under rationale for including the artifact.
The student is also advised to include his/her best work and explain why the selected work is his/her best work. It is tempting to put samples in the e-portfolio to fill gaps that one perceives in his/her skills or experience, even when that work is not good quality. Students are better off leaving such work out of their e-portfolio and looking for opportunities to do better work as soon as possible..
In addition to the above contents, the student must add the following items to his/her e-portfolio:
Signature Page: Please see Graduate Thesis Format for the signature page. This page must be created in Word Processing and be printed for the E-Portfolio chair and committee members to sign after the e-portfolio defense. The Signature page then must be scanned and be linked to the final draft of the e-portfolio home page before final submission or be programmed so that it would pop up before the viewer can open the e-portfolio home page.
Title page: May be similar to the signature page. However, this page should not need the signature of your e-portfolio committee. You may insert or link your own picture and your committee members’ names and pictures and/or attach video or audio clips for such introduction.
Acknowledgment: This page is optional. But if you wish to thank particular individuals for their contributions and support during your completion of your e-portfolio you may want to create this page and link it to the e-portfolio home page or arrange it so that the page would pop up before the viewer can open the e-portfolio home page.
Table of Contents/Site Map: This page should show the viewer the content of the e-portfolio at a glance. Buttons can be added to this page to link the viewer to the desired information. The viewer must have an option of choosing the information he/she wants to see and in what order.
Home page and related pages: See the “Step 3” for information about the e-portfolio site map and its organization and sequence.
Resume & Professional References
Bibliographical ReferencProof that the student is in the last regular semester before graduation -- acceptable proof is the completed Masters Planning Sheet
List of professional references (3 minimum)
A brief statement indicating roles of the references, and why the student has selected these people as reference
Upon receiving the final words from the review committee regarding the general approval of the e-portfolio, the student should schedule an oral meeting in which he/she will presenthis/her e-portfolio and answer the questions. The oral portion of the exam should be scheduled approximately two weeks following the final approval of the e-portfolio. The student is responsible for providing a final draft of the e-portfolio and its supporting materials to the review committee two week before the defense is scheduled.
The student can organize his/her work a number of ways:
Categorized by type of included projects
Categorized by the skills demonstrated
Ordered by the estimation of the work's quality
Ordered by the relevance of the work to the individual’s goals
Whatever organization plan the student uses, he/she should pick one and be consistent. The review committee will be looking to see if the e-portfolio is organized consistently and clearly. The student should consider including a Table of Contents, and make sure the organization of the e-portfolio is reflected in it.
The student may decide to order his/her work by relevance or by quality, and provide an indicator on the annotation pages of the specific skills the work demonstrates. This method allows the student to organize the e-portfolio on two levels, without adding so much complexity that viewers are confused or distracted by the organization scheme itself
Suggested
Developmental Process of an E-Portfolio
Step 1: Getting Started
Step 2: Planning
Step 3: Collecting, Selecting, & Designing
Collect and store the identified artifacts in appropriate folders on your disk or server. Organize the materials into a sequence for the best presentation of the materials with a link to the goals/objectives/competencies.
Step 4: Developing
Now, it is time to actually develop your e-portfolio in a connected form.
Use a Web Authoring program such as Deamweaver to create the e-portfolio home page and its related pages. Organize the buttons on the home page based on how you want to present your goals, objectives, and competencies and related artifacts. The following are examples of two different organizations for the buttons.
Format 1
Format 2
Follow your site map to develop related pages for each link on the site home page. Consult with your faculty advisor in every step and get his/her approval.
Step 5: Assessing/Evaluating
Step: 6: Presenting
Check to make sure that you have access to the following hardware and software
Alternative Software
Roles & Responsibilities of Faculty Supervising E-Portfolio
The faculty member supervising the e-portfolio development has the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that the student has produced a high quality work and that the student has fulfilled the procedure and deadlines. The faculty supervisor is specifically responsible for:
Selecting the E-Portfolio Review Committee: In consultation with the student and the MIT program coordinator the faculty supervisor is responsible for selecting the e-portfolio review committee. Faculty/staff members who are selected to serve in the review committee must be asked and agree to serve in the committee and must be informed of the e-portfolio development process.
Approving the Student's Identified Artifacts/Products, Annotation, Design and Organization. The faculty member is integral to the appropriate match between student career goals and the selected artifacts/products, annotation, design and organization of the e-portfolio. Often a series of discussions are necessary during the selection process.
Approving the Development Plan. Upon the informal approval of student's development plan, the faculty supervisor must ask the student to submit a tentative development plan with a brief explanation of her/his career goals and list of artifacts. The faculty supervisor must then share this plan with the review committee and seek their initial approval. When the faculty supervisor received the approval of the review committee he/she must inform the student to begin the development process.
Reviewing Student Work: It is the responsibility of the faculty supervisor to review the draft of the material as it is being developed and provide constructive feedback as many time as needed. If necessary the faculty supervisor may ask the review committee to read portions of student work while it is being developed. However, the faculty supervisor is responsible for keeping the review committee informed about the progress of student work and consulting them if needed. Four weeks before the deadline for the e-portfolio defense the faculty supervisor must ask the student to submit the final draft of the e-portfolio to her/her review committee and ask for their feedback. Upon approval of the first draft and two weeks before the e-portfolio defense the faculty supervisor must ask student to submit the final draft of the e-portfolio to the review committee.
Scheduling & Conducting E-Portfolio Defense: The faculty supervisor is responsible for informing the student of the e-portfolio defense deadline and procedure. She/he is also responsible for making sure that all members of the review committee are consulted and agreed to attend the e-portfolio defense. The faculty supervisor is also responsible for reserving a room and conducting the defense session. Upon the successful completion of the defense the faculty supervisor may seek formal approval of the review committee's until final revisions are completed and the signature page is ready to be signed.
Review Process & Evaluation Criteria
Review of the physical e-portfolio by the review committee and presentation (defense) of the e-portfolio by the student are both required for the completion of the MS capstone experience. The student must submit the final draft version of the e-portfolio to his/her e-portfolio committee for review at least two weeks before the scheduled defense. During the review process the chair of the review committee and the two faculty members on the review team will evaluate the e-portfolio according to the e-portfolio evaluation checklist and give feedback to the student. The student then should revise the materials if needed and resubmit the final version to the review committee a minimum of 7 days before the scheduled defense.
In order to merit a positive evaluation, the physical e-portfolio must
meet or exceed minimum standards in all areas (I-VI) described on E-Portfolio
Evaluation Checklist. Minimum standards are met if the e-portfolio conforms
to the Guidelines in consensus judgment of the review committee.
During the review each faculty evaluator (committee member) will examine
the e-portfolio independently, and make individual judgments. Each faculty
evaluator is to make a judgment indicating whether the e-portfolio meets
or exceeds minimum standards. The chair of the e-portfolio committee must
ask the committee members to write positive or negative comments on a
separate sheet of paper and make recommendations for changes and revisions
required to bring the e-portfolio up to the minimum standards.
If standards are met the chair and members of the review committee will
initial the E-Portfolio Evaluation Checklist in the e-portfolio to indicate
fulfillment of areas I-VI and a positive judgment on the physical e-portfolio.
Disagreements in judgment between/among faculty evaluators must be discussed
and consensus judgment must be reached before the approval of the e-portfolio.
If there are strong disagreements between/among the committee members
the consultation of an addition review member must be sought.
If the physical e-portfolio does not meet minimum standards in each of
the areas (I-VI), the E-Portfolio Evaluation Checklist will so indicate.
A list of required additional changes will be complied by the chair of
e-portfolio review committee and due date for completion will be inserted
into the e-portfolio. The review committee may decide to allow the student
defend (present) his/her incomplete e-portfolio at the scheduled e-portfolio
defense session. However, the completion of the MS degree will be pending
until all the required changes and revisions are completely satisfied.
E-Portfolio Defense (Presentation)
The review committee will give back the physical e-portfolio to the student at least five days before the scheduled presentation (defense). The e-portfolio presentation should be prepared as a summary of the product and the process rather than a page-by-page description of the e-portfolio. When presenting the e-portfolio the student must assume that he/she is in a job interview and is presenting his/her e-portfolio to a panel of interviewers. The student is encouraged to support the presentation with handouts and visuals if necessary.
During the e-portfolio presentation session (defense) the student will
briefly (15-20 minutes) present his/her e-portfolio to the review committee
and the assembled group of peers and other guests. Following the student
presentation the floor will be opened for questions from the review committee
(who will play the role of job interviewers), peers or guests. This questioning
process will take about 20 minutes. The chair of the review committee
will then ask the audience (peers and other guests) to leave the room
while the review committee makes its decision. The review committee will
then discuss briefly to judge the student's fulfillment of the criteria.
It is expected that the student meet or exceed the criteria. The review
committee will initial the E-Portfolio Evaluation checklist in the student
e-portfolio to indicate fulfillment of the standards/criteria. A for mal
signature page will be signed by the review committee once the student
is ready to bound the final copy of his/her e-portfolio to be used as
a documentary record.
To
Top p
Top
Evaluation Criteria
| List
of Criteria |
Consensus
Judgment |
| I: E-Portfolio includes a list of identified competencies required of an instructional technologist in a specified career track. | Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| II. E-Portfolio provides a clear description of each competency and its importance for a specified career track. | Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| III. E-Portfolio includes clearly labeled artifacts, which demonstrate competency in all identified areas for a specified career track. | Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| IV. E-Portfolio organization is meaningful, original, and constructed to facilitate review. | Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| V. Documentation is complete and consistent. | Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| VI. E-Portfolio demonstrates thoughtful, in-depth reflection on processes and products. | Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| Overall Rating Chair Review Committee___________________ Faculty reviewer 1________________________ Faculty reviewer 2 ________________________ Outside reviewer _________________________ |
Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| E-Portfolio is provided and presented to reviewers in a timely and professional manner. Chair Review Committee___________________ Faculty reviewer 1________________________ Faculty reviewer 2 ________________________ Outside reviewer _________________________ |
Does not meet minimum standards Meets minimum standards Exceeds minimum standards Far exceeds minimum standards |
| Program Coordinator _______________________________ Date _____________ |
Student
Self Evaluation Checklist
Check yourself for Success
Your e-portfolio should be a unique document, one, which represents you
as well as your skills, knowledge, and experience. The following checklist
includes some general characteristics of good e-portfolio, which may help
you to plan and evaluate your document.
Look at the section in which you have explained who you want to be
and what you want to do….
Defined a list of professional goals and objectives
Searched and examined at least 10 jobs in the setting that you desire
to work
Identified the common job responsibilities required of the type of job
you would like to apply for once graduated
Converted job responsibilities to a list of competencies that you must
demonstrate in order to be hired in your desired job
Defined and explained each competency clearly, related it to your professional
goals and objectives and indicated the evidence and data that would support
it
Look at your artifacts, captions, and rationale….
Represented your knowledge of theory, research and practice
Demonstrated competence in design, development, utilization, management
and evaluation
Reflections show growth, insight, and/or a widening of perspectives
Demonstrated your motivation for professional practice and continued growth
Demonstrated your flexibility in approaches to problems and issues
Demonstrated respect and concern for other people
Look at your e-portfolio format and style….
Logical organization is clearly explained in the introduction and is used
throughout
Dividers, tabs, and/or other devices are used to separate sections of
main documents and appendices
Sample materials and products are separated and properly labeled
Computer and media materials or samples include instruction/requirement
for use if necessary
All printed materials are typed and word-processed unless they are handwritten
samples
Grammar /spelling are absolutely correct and writing style follows accepted
standards
An overall profession appearance is maintained
Look at your e-portfolio presentation/defense….
Presentation is a summary of the competencies, products and the process
Presentation may, for example:
Highlight unique features of your e-portfolio
Highlight your unique characteristics with respect to the list of identified competencies
Explain the relationship between and among products and competencies
Make connection between your products and your professional goals
Describe the future goals and planned professional development
Presentation includes appropriate audience aids
Presentation adheres to its time limit
To Top p
Designed & Developed by Mahnaz
Moallem