Introduction
to Reading
First
Martin
Kozloff
David Gill
July, 2004
This paper describes the main features of
Reading First: (1) the five major reading skills; (2) three kinds of curricula;
(3) four kinds of assessments; (4) systematic and explicit instruction; (5)
scientific validation of all aspects of instruction (the first four items in
this list); and (6) reading as a school-wide endeavor.
A
Concise View of Reading: Five Major Skills, or Big Ideas
Reading First provides educators with
a clear picture of reading. Proficient
reading consists of five major skills.
When these skills are taught in a logically progressive sequence, early
skills help students to learn and use the later-taught skills—leading to
accurate, rapid reading with comprehension and enjoyment. Below are brief definitions of each of the
five main skills. Statements in italics
are from the IDEA website, at http://reading.uoregon.edu/big_ideas/trial_bi_index.php
1. Phonemic Awareness: The ability to hear and
manipulate sounds in words. There are about a dozen ways to hear and
manipulate sounds in words. These ways
are best taught from easier to harder.
For example,
a. Identify words that sound the same
and different. run,
sit, fun
b. Rhyme. can, man, fan, rrr__
c. Count the number of words in a
sentence.
The dog sat by the cat = 6 words
d. Count the number of sounds (phonemes)
in a word.
e. Blend sounds into words. rrrruuuunnn à run
f. Segment words into sounds. Run à rrruuunnn
sat = /s/a/t/ = 3 sounds
g. Segment words by identifying the
first, last, and middle (medial) sounds. “What is the first sound in rrrruuuunnn?”
h. Identify what word it would be if one
sound were removed (phoneme deletion). “Listen… sssaaaat. Take out the ssss. What word now?...”
i. Identify
what a word would be if a sound were replaced with another. “Listen…. ssssiiiit. Take away the ssss
and put in fff.
What word now?...”
However, it is not necessary to teach all of these examples of phonemic awareness. The most important are blending, segmenting,
and rhyming.
Phonemic awareness helps
students learn to read and do other literacy skills. How? A
student who can hear and manipulate the sounds
(phonemes) in words, can more easily: (1) remember which sound goes with which
letter; (2) sound out words [cat. k/aaaa/t.]; (3) spell [How do you spell
cat. kaaaat . /k/ is c. /a/ is a. /t/ is t.” ]; and (4)
detect and correct errors in reading and spelling. See http://reading.uoregon.edu/pa/index.php
for more information on phonemic awareness.
2. Alphabetic Principle: The ability to associate sounds with
letters and use these sounds to form words. Notice that the alphabetic principle
(sometimes called phonics) has two skill-parts.
a. The students knows
letter-sound or sound-symbol relationships: that m says /m/, i says /i/, and r says /r/.
b. When the student sees an unfamiliar
word (rim) in a story book, the student uses letter-sound knowledge to sound
out or decode the word—-perhaps letter by letter and then quickly.
“The bike has a bent rrrriiiimmm….rim.”
Using the alphabetic principle (shown above), the student knows exactly what the word says.
In contrast, students who are not taught phonics in a systematic way, or who are not taught
to use phonics knowledge as the
first and most reliable strategy for identifying words, have to guess or “predict” what words say using “context cues,” such as
pictures or what seems to fit the meaning of a sentence, as shown below. Instead of reading “The bike has a bent rim,”
the student guesses
“The bike has a be…be..bell…belt….ri…ri…rip. The bike has a belt rip.”
Often, these mis-taught students never learn to read
skillfully. That is why Reading First stresses systematic and explicit
instruction in the alphabetic principle.
Read more at http://reading.uoregon.edu/au/index.php
3. Fluency with Text: The effortless, automatic ability to read
words in connected text. Fluency is reading with accuracy and speed. Fluency is important both for enjoyment and comprehension. If
a person struggles with words (gu…qu…guil…quil…) ,
the person will also struggle
to figure out the meaning of sentences. In fact, dysfluent readers spend so much time and effort
trying to figure out what the separate words say, they can barely pay
attention to the meaning of the sentence.
“The ju..jur….jury
found her gu..qu…guil…quil…”)
In other words, they learn very little from reading.
To help students read connected text
(e.g., story passages) accurately and quickly, it is important to:
a. Teach students to decode separate
words (regular and irregular) accurately
and quickly—which means (1) using knowledge of letter-sound correspondence (not guessing); and (2) blending the sounds into words.
b. Teach
students to self-correct.
c. Provide
practice reading words enough times that it is almost automatic; that is, the words become “sight
words.” Note: sight words are not words a student
memorizes. The student still knows how to decode them letter by letter. Rather, the student has read the words so
often that decoding takes only an
instant.
d. Provide
practice reading text with which students are already accurate, encouraging them to read faster and faster
without making errors (i.e., more words correct per minute, or wcpm).
Read more about fluency here. http://reading.uoregon.edu/flu/
4. Vocabulary: The ability to understand (receptive) and
use (expressive) words to acquire and convey meaning. The three reading skills above—(1) phonemic
awareness, (2) the alphabetic principle (letter-sound correspondence and the
strategy for sounding out or decoding words), and (3) fluency—have to do with
the mechanics of reading. The last two
skills—vocabulary and comprehension—have to do with making sense of the written word.
Vocabulary
and comprehension cannot be taken for granted.
Students need to be taught how to get and express
the meaning of words and passages. This
is especially important for students of low socioeconomic status. These students are read to less often, hear
fewer vocabulary words, and therefore understand and use far fewer words than
children born to working class or professional class families.
Following are some of the more
important methods of vocabulary instruction.
1. Read
storybooks
to children.
2. Provide direct instruction of new vocabulary words by selecting important words in a story; giving
explanations, or definitions of the words; and giving students many chances to
discuss and use the new words.
3. Teach older students to use morphemic analysis (analysis of word parts) to determine meaning.
For example, “Bisect. Bi means two.
Sect means divide. So, bisect means divide into two parts.”
4. Teach contextual analysis--inferring the meaning of a word from the context in which
it occurs. “The fan’s oscillations cooled everyone in the room…Sometimes fans
move back and forth. If everyone was
cooled, it probably means the fan blew on everyone. So, oscillate probably means to move back and
forth.”
You can find more on vocabulary here. http://reading.uoregon.edu/voc/
5. Comprehension: The complex cognitive process involving the
intentional interaction between reader and text to convey meaning. In other
words, sentences don’t tell you what they mean.
You have to interact with the text—for example, asking questions,
checking to see if the text gives answers, rereading, connecting one sentence
with a later sentence to get the flow of the argument or the flow of events in
time. These comprehension strategies are learned best when they are
taught explicitly. This kind of instruction
includes the following.
1. Set comprehension objectives; for example, students will answer specific literal (who, what, when), inferential (why), and evaluative (can
you think of a better way…?) questions.
2. Focus on main ideas in a story or informational text.
3. Preteach vocabulary words important for comprehending the material.
4. Read (with students) the material in manageable chunks, and ask literal, inferential, and evaluative questions
on each chunk.
5. Use a KWL strategy: have students think about and discuss what I know; what I want to know; and what I learned.
You can learn more about comprehension here. http://reading.uoregon.edu/comp
A
Comprehensive Set of Curriculum Materials
No set of curriculum materials
(program) is adequate for teaching all five main reading skills to all
beginning readers. A set of materials
will have one or more of the following weaknesses.
1. The scope
and sequence
(what is taught and in what order) does
not adequately cover all five skills. For example, there is too little instruction on
phonemic awareness, or some of the skills are taught in the wrong order.
2. The materials are designed for the average student, and do not provide the
sort of instruction needed by students (1) who enter with (for example) a small
vocabulary, or little phonemic awareness, or little knowledge of letter-sound
correspondence; or (2) students with specific
difficulties
learning to read. For example, a student
knows how to sound out words, but the student needs five seconds to do it. As a result, the student can’t keep pace as
the teacher points to words on the board and asks the class to read each one
quickly.
Therefore, a comprehensive reading curriculum will have
more than one set of materials. Reading
First recommends three kinds of curriculum materials, or what is sometimes
called the “three-tier model”--which you can read about
at the following websites.
Here are the three kinds of programs.
1. Core curriculum. A core reading program should: (1) cover
virtually all five main reading skills; (2) be designed so that it will be
useful for almost all beginning readers; and (3) be well-designed, in terms of
sequencing of skills, practice, and building simpler skills into more complex
wholes, to name a few features. The University of Oregon’s website states:
A
core reading program is the primary instructional tool that teachers use to
teach children to learn to read and ensure they reach reading levels that meet
or exceed grade-level standards. A core program should address the
instructional needs of the majority of students in a respective school or
district…Adoption of a core does not imply that other materials and strategies
are not used to provide a rich, comprehensive program of instruction. The core
program, however, should serve as the primary reading program for the school
and the expectation is that all teachers within and between the primary grades
will use the core program as the base of reading instruction. Such programs may
or may not be commercial textbook series…Teaching reading is far more complex
than most professionals and laypersons realize. The demands of the phonologic,
alphabetic, semantic, and syntactic systems of written language require a
careful schedule and sequence of prioritized objectives, explicit strategies,
and scaffolds that support students' initial learning and transfer of knowledge
and skills to other contexts. The requirements of curriculum construction and
instructional design that effectively move children through the "learning
to read" stage to the "reading to learn" stage are simply too
important to leave to the judgment of individuals. The better the core
addresses instructional priorities, the less teachers
will need to supplement and modify instruction for the majority of
learners. [http://reading.uoregon.edu/curricula/core_program.php]
Criteria
for evaluating core reading programs, and reviews of many core programs, can be
found here. http://reading.uoregon.edu/curricula/index.php
http://reading.uoregon.edu/appendices/con_guide.php
http://reading.uoregon.edu/curricula/or_rfc_review_2.php
2. Supplementary Curricula. Supplementary curricula
or programs are used to in two ways.
First, they fill gaps in
a core reading program. For example, a
core program may have too little instruction on rhyming (one aspect of phonemic
awareness), or it may have too few storybooks connected to its instruction on
decoding and vocabulary. Therefore, a
school or district would purchase or create materials to give the additional
instruction.
Second, a core program may not
provide the amount of highly
focused instruction some students need on certain
skills. For example, some students enter school with
a vocabulary so small that they don’t know what the stories are about. Therefore, a school or district might use a
supplementary program for accelerating
these
students’ vocabulary development.
Caution. It is important to select core and
supplementary materials that are compatible, or at least to train
teachers to make them compatible. For
example, a core program might tell teachers properly and exactly how to correct
errors when students misread words in connected text. For example, the word is “made” but a student
reads “mad.” “He
m….mmm…mad the....”
Teacher. “That word is made. What word?”
Student. “made.”
Teacher. “Spell
made.”
Student. “m a d e”
Teacher. “What word?”
Student. “made.”
Teacher. “Yes,
made. Please start the sentence again,
Joey.”
However, the supplementary materials might not tell
teachers how to correct reading errors, or may suggest a different method
(format). This will confuse students. So,
the school either has to use core and supplemental materials that correct
errors the same way, or the school has to decide that teachers will apply to
all supplementary materials the error correction format used in the core
program.
3. Intervention
Curricula. Intervention programs are
designed to meet the needs of students with so little background knowledge or
so much difficulty learning to read that they need specially designed
instruction and special, additional time for instruction. For example, diagnostic assessment may show
that some kindergartners are falling behind, perhaps because their phonemic
awareness skills are still so weak. Or,
some third graders struggle to comprehend text because they are still weak on
basic comprehension skills. In both
cases, students would get extra time for interventions, using materials that
focus on their skill weaknesses.
Caution. As before, it is important that core and
intervention materials are compatible; e.g., both teach the same comprehension
strategies. In addition, teachers must
ensure that what students learn
during intervention instruction is transferred to general (core) reading
instruction. For example, teachers must ensure that
students are taught to use their new phonemic
awareness and comprehension skills when they are with the rest of the class
reading storybooks in the core materials.
Otherwise, intervention instruction will have no benefits.
You can read more about
supplementary and intervention programs at the following websites.
Four
Kinds of Assessments
One of the basic ideas in Reading First is
that instruction should be a
rational process. Teachers need solid
information on the skills students bring and do not bring to reading
instruction, on the progress they are making during instruction, and how much
progress they made during the year.
Without this information, teachers can’t successfully: (1) assign
students to proper reading groups and to properly trained teachers; (2) decide
if the core program is adequate or if students need supplemental or
intervention instruction (and on exactly which skills); or (3) decide at the
end of the year if students are ready to move to the next year/level of a core
program. Therefore, Reading First
advocates four kinds of assessments.
Each has a different function.
Screening
Assessment. Screening assessment is done when students enter a
beginning reading program or at the start of the year. The function is to determine whether a
student has the entry skills (e.g., knowledge of the alphabet, phonemic
awareness, and vocabulary) that are likely to make instruction in the core
program alone adequate, or whether the student has specific skill deficits and
learning difficulties that require supplemental and/or intervention
instruction.
Progress
Monitoring. Progress is
monitored on skills worked on. These
assessments might be done, for example, every month to see if or how students’
skill at decoding (sounding out) words is improving or if or how much fluency
(measured as words correct per minute, wcpm) is
increasing. Again, this information
would be used to make instructional decisions.
Perhaps a student should be moved to a reading group that is progressing
more quickly. Or a student might get
extra practice at decoding so the student reads connected text more accurately
and quickly. Or, a student’s progress
may be so slow that intervention instruction is called for. However, before that is done, more
information is needed—supplied by diagnostic assessment, discussed later.
Progress monitoring also says
something about the quality of
a curriculum and/or the quality of instruction delivered by teachers. For example,
2. Students in Ms. Black’s class make excellent
progress in the core program, but students in Ms. Winter’s class do not. This suggests that Ms. Winter may not be
using the core properly. For example,
Ms. Winter may not correct errors, or she may go to the next lesson before
students master skills in the present one.
In this case, Ms. Winter’s teaching must be assessed. The inventory, here, shows how to assess
teachers’ reading instruction. http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/inventory.doc
Diagnostic Assessment. Screening assessment may show that a student has little knowledge of phonemic
awareness. Does this mean the student is
not read to and talked with enough at home, or does it mean the student can’t
easily hear the differences between one word and another? Likewise, progress monitoring may show that a
student is not picking up skill at sounding out words. Does this mean the student’s knowledge of
letter-sound relationships (s says /s/) is weak (and therefore the student
can’t say and blend the separate sounds in many words), or could it be the
student knows letter-sound relationships but has a hard time retrieving and then using this knowledge quickly
enough to keep up with the pace of instruction?
Clearly, making the right instructional decision requires answers to
these questions, which are supplied by diagnostic assessment.
Outcome
Assessment. Outcome assessment determines how much students have
learned at the end of a semester or year.
This information is used to evaluate: (1) the quality of the core,
supplemental, and intervention materials; (2) the quality of instruction; (3)
student motivation, attention, and participation; and (4) students’ specific
reading difficulties—leading to decisions about curricula (keep, change,
modify), instruction (ways to improve and how to assist teachers), and
classroom management.
Assessment instruments should:
(1) provide valid information (information
on the skills that need to be measured); (2) be appropriate for students’ age and grade level; (3) be reliable (different users would get about the same
data with the same students); (4) be relatively
easy to use;
and (5) provide objective information (e.g., 100
correct words per minute) rather than impressions (“Sally reads pretty
accurately and quickly”). Therefore,
it’s wise to select instruments with a solid track record. Sources below describe and evaluate many
assessment instruments.
http://www.fcrr.org/assessment/
Systematic and Explicit
Instruction
The
most respected scientific research in education and psychology shows clearly
that instruction yields higher and faster achievement in more students (with
and without learning difficulties) when instruction is systematic and
explicit. Here are some resources you might
examine.
http://epaa.asu.edu/barak/barak.html
http://epaa.asu.edu/barak/barak1.html
http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech05.pdf
http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech06.html
But
what does systematic and explicit mean?
Systematic means that:
1. Instruction is given in a planned, logically progressive sequence
of things to be taught. For example,
certain letter-sounds (a, s, i, m, r) are taught
before other letter-sounds (b, n, y, sh) because they
are easier to learn and are used more often.
2. Instruction is guided and assessed with clearly defined objectives for
everything taught. Objectives are stated
in terms of what students will do.
Good
objective. Students are given two
minutes to read the assigned passage from
“The bear and the hare.” They read the passage at a rate of at least 100 words
correct per minute.”
Poor objective.
Students read story books quickly and get most words right.
3. Instruction is focused precisely on the thing (knowledge unit) to be learned, as
specified by the objective. For example,
if students are to read a passage at 100 wcpm, then
that is exactly what the teacher focuses on during the ten minute fluency exercise during lessons. She does not work on fluency, vocabulary, and
comprehension at the same time.
4. Instruction provides planned practice to strengthen all of the skills worked on.
5. Instruction provides planned work on new examples (e.g., words, text) to foster
application or generalization of previously taught knowledge.
6. Instruction includes assessments designed and used in a timely fashion to monitor the
different phases of instruction, or mastery: acquisition, fluency,
generalization, retention, and independence.
Explicit
means that:
1. The teacher reveals in an obvious and clear
way to students the knowledge she is trying to communicate. She does this through demonstrations (modeling) and running
commentary to students. For example,
“I’ll
show you how to sound out this word. [man is written on the board.] Listen. I do NOT stop between the sounds. [Teacher touches under each letter as she
says the sound.] mmmmaaaannn.
Now, I’ll say it fast. [Teacher
slides her finger under the word.] man.”
2. The teacher ensures student attention to
important features of an example or demonstration. “Look [points to the word ate] here is a
vowel, then a consonant, and then an e at the end [name]. So, we do NOT say the e at the end.”
Here
is an example of instruction that is not
explicit. It is implicit—or buried in the
teacher’s talk.
The teacher holds up a big book that
has a paragraph from a story. She reads the words slowly. Occasionally she points
to the letter r and says rrr. She expects that this will be enough for
students to get the connection between the letter and the sound. Of course, many students do not get it.
In
contrast, explicit instruction would
have the teacher hold up the big book and say,
“New sound. This sound (points to the letter r in ran)
is rrr. Say it
with me… And this sound (points to r in
car) is rrr.
Say it with me… And this sound (points to r in barn) is rrr. Let’s see if
you remember our new sound. What sound
is this? (points
to r in ran)… What sound is this? (points to r in barn)… What sound is this? (points to r in
car)…. Now I’ll read the story. (Teacher points to each r as she reads and
has students say rrr and then read the whole word.)
As
you can imagine, this explicit instruction of letter-sound correspondence is
more likely to teach most students quickly.
Scientific Validation
This is one of the most important
contributions of Reading First. Every
curriculum or program, every teaching method (e.g., how to correct errors), and
every assessment instrument must be:
1. Valid (does what it is
supposed to do) and reliable (works
much the same way in the hands of different people).
2. Based
on scientific research. For example,
the sequence for teaching phonemic awareness (beginning with identifying words
that sound alike vs. different, and ending with replacing a phoneme and saying
the new word) in a core program must be based on solid scientific research that
says this is an effective sequence.
3. Field
tested to ensure that it is valid and reliable and effective before it is used.
Teachers
will be more confident, and certainly will be more effective, if all of their
teaching methods and materials are known to work. The following websites have more information
on scientific validation.
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/RigorousEvidence.pdf
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/whatresearchsays.htm
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/Research%20and%20Reason.pdf
http://www.ecs.org/html/educationIssues/Research/primer/understandingtutorial.asp
Reading is a School-wide Endeavor
If teachers in different grade levels
and classes use different curricula, different assessments, different rules for
interpreting assessment data and for making instructional decisions, and
different teaching methods, their students are not likely to benefit as much
from reading instruction as they would if reading were a coordinated
school-wide activity. Therefore, schools
need to:
1. Develop a school mission that stresses the importance of reading, sets high but
realistic achievement goals for each year, and assumes primary responsibility
for students’ achievement.
2. Examine
different curricula and assessment instruments (using materials at the
websites listed above), and select the ones that have been shown to be most
effective.
3. Select
the right teachers for the right jobs.
It is essential that the best teachers teach students in the early
stages of reading and teach students who are behind or who need interventions.
4. Select
specialists to coordinate testing, collect assessment information, order
curricula, obtain outside consultation and training, and provide technical
assistance to teachers.
5. Have
principals and other administrators who know the five reading skills; know
what explicit and systematic instruction looks like; know what effective
reading instruction looks like; know what to ask job applicants to ensure that
they get skilled teachers; know the criteria that define adequate curricula;
and have the strength to require teachers to use curricula faithfully and to
improve their teaching as needed.
6. Provide professional
development on all aspects of Reading First, as well as timely ongoing
assistance.
Here
is the website for an instrument that lays out the skills teachers need. It can also be used as a guide for
assessment, professional development, and ongoing assistance.
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/inventory.doc
Addition
materials on school-wide implementation include the following.
http://oregonreadingfirst.uoregon.edu/downloads/Program_Fidelity_Checklist.doc
http://www.texasreading.org/utcrla/
http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/al_jan_02.pdf
http://readingserver.edb.utexas.edu/downloads/primary/guides/2000_word_analysis_SE.PDF
http://reading.uoregon.edu/logistics/trial_log_index.php
Let’s Summarize
The six features of Reading First
discussed above amount to an integrated approach
to reading.
1. There are five main reading skills:
phonemic awareness, the alphabetic principle (letter-sound
correspondence and using this knowledge to decode words), fluency (accuracy and
speed), vocabulary, and comprehension.
2. Three kinds of curricula ensure that virtually all children learn
to read: core programs, supplementary programs, and intervention programs—with
placement determined by assessment information.
3. There
are four kinds of assessments: screening, diagnostic, progress monitoring, and
outcome. These provide information used
to make decisions about students’ curriculum and instructional needs, the
quality of curricula used, and the quality of instruction.
4. The wisest course is to teach all skills systematically (in a
planned, logical sequence) and explicitly (the teacher clearly demonstrates
knowledge).
5. All of the above are based on the rules and procedures of
scientific research to ensure validity, reliability, and effectiveness.
6. All of the above are part of a coordinated, school-wide effort that
includes clear mission, strong leadership, assignments based on expertise, and
professional development.