Home
Up

Case Analysis #1
Read "Case Study 4: The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger." It is on reserve in the library.  You should also read the following handouts:
    
Handouts - Challenger Disaster
  
Read "Case Study 4: The Last Flight of Space Shuttle Challenger" which is on reserve in the library. You should also read the article by Romzek and Dubnick entitled "Accountability in the Public Sector" that is also on reserve.  You may want to look at NASA's web site and the site devoted to the Space Shuttle and its current launch status.   You could also look at sites devoted to the history of the space shuttle and  the Challenger Disaster.   Finally, you may want to read through the Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident, which is referred to in the case.  Time permitting, we will supplement the class discussion with a video that explores how a phenomena called groupthink might have contributed to the ill-fated launch decision.

If you are curious about the similarities between the Challenger and Columbia Disasters, read this article from The Atlantic and Chapter 8 from the report prepared by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB)

  

Assignment

Once you have read the case, prepare a memorandum that answers the following questions:
    
Imagine you were a staff person working for the Presidential Commission.  Write a memo to the commission with your recommendation as to whether the decision to launch was justified.  In formulating your findings be sure to identify any administrative problems that contributed to the launch decision and provide recommendations for changes that could be taken to improve the safety of future space shuttle operations.  
    
Your memo should follow the guidelines for analyzing cases and preparing memos provided on this web site. 
  

Class Discussion

After reading the case and these other materials carefully, you should come to class prepared to discuss questions such as:
  
  1. Who are the principal actors or players?
  2. How was the case affected by the sequence of events?
  3. What were some of the political pressures that led to the decision to launch? What were the sources of these pressures?
  4. What were some of the bureaucratic pressures that led to the decision to launch? What were the sources of these pressures?
  5. Do you feel that the political and bureaucratic pressures are justified?
  6. If you were placed in the position that the Thiokol engineers were, what would you have done? Do you think that you would have succumbed to the "group think" phenomena?
  7. In your view, who was the most responsible or irresponsible for the decision to launch the space shuttle? What are some of the problems with assigning responsibility for the decision?
  8. One of the handouts notes that many within NASA are worried that the agency may be undergoing a shift back to the management system that was nearly identical to the one that lead to the Challenger Disaster. Why do you think that may be happening?
Students are reminded that failure to actively participate in case discussions will adversely affect your class participation grade.
 

Back to Mark T. Imperial's Homepage

Page last modified 08/03/04

Report problems to imperialm@uncw.edu