Part I: Short Answer
Questions (40%)
|
Directions
|
You have
10 short answer questions worth 4 points each. The short answer
questions will come in various forms such as: List three types of _____ ; Define and
explain how three types of _____ operate; Explain what is meant by ______ ; In the
video/case what was meant by _____? Accordingly, some answers will involve listing terms
while other will require describing terms or concepts in either a few sentences or short
paragraphs. You should also be able to apply them to videos and handouts discussed in
class. In general, there will not be much overlap between the essay questions and the
short answer questions. |
|
Terms/Concepts
|
Glocal (Hemple) |
Steps in the policy process
model |
Contamination, ecosimplification, and natural resource
consumption (Hemple) |
institutional,
governmental, official agenda |
Systemic or
noninstitutional agenda |
Environmentalism |
Agenda setting/building |
Radical environmentalists |
Policy entrepreneurs & Policy saboteurs |
Pragmatic reformers/mainstream environmental
groups |
Triggering/focusing events |
Hemple's 8 variables or driving forces |
Distribution of costs
and benefits shapes agenda setting |
Common pool resources |
Estimation/policy formulation |
Hardin's "tragedy of the commons" |
Selection/legitimation/adoption |
Cornucopian |
Implementation |
Catastrophists |
Evaluation |
Optimizer |
Termination/start over |
Malthusian/neomalthusian |
Continuation/justification |
Wise use movement/Sagebrush Rebellion |
Adjustment/policy change |
NIMBY |
role of science in the policy process
(which stages is it most useful) |
|
Part II: Essay Questions (60%)
|
Directions
|
You will have to answer
3 of the questions below. There will be 1 required question and there may be some
choice for the second question. Each answer should clearly address all aspects of
the question. You should define all key terms/concepts used in your answer. You should
also support your answer using examples from books, lectures, class notes, videos, or
handouts whenever possible. |
|
1) Hardin (1968) argues, "ruin is the destination toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best
interest in a society that believes in the freedom of the commons. Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all." Do
you agree or is it possible to avoid or overcome the tragedy of the commons? In your answer be sure to describe
Hardin's tragedy of the commons and provide examples of a typical common pool resource. What policy options
are often used to overcome commons problems? Do you readings offer any examples of successful efforts to
avoid the commons problem? Under what situations do the readings suggest commons management is more
likely to succeed? |
|
2) In 1798, Thomas Malthus warned that the human race was doomed because geometric population increases
would inexorably outstrip productive capacity, leading to famine and poverty. Hardin (1968) also warns that we
live in a finite world that can only support a finite population and that continued increases in the worlds
population will increasingly strain limited resources and sustainability. Others are less pessimistic and point out
that some of the world's biggest polluters are not the ones with the largest populations. Suppose you just got a
job as President Bush's environmental policy advisor. Your first task is to represent the U.S. at an upcoming
international conference looking at the impacts of population on the environment. Before you leave for the
conference, "W" wants to know what you plan to say. Are you more concerned about developing nations such
as China and India with large and growing populations or developed countries like the U.S. and Europe with
relatively stable populations? Do you think population control is essential to the long-term protection of the
global environment? What are the strengths and weaknesses of this argument? What other factors help mitigate
the impacts associated with population growth? |
|
3) Describe the eight
variables or driving forces that Hemple (1996) proposes for explaining
environmental impacts. Describe each variable and some of the
important relationships between the variables. Be sure to use
examples from the readings, videos, or issue memos to illustrate how
these variables can be used to explain the causes of an environmental
problem. Do you think this is a good framework for describing the
causes of environmental problems? What are the advantages and
disadvantages to using this framework to understand the causes of
environmental problems? |
|
4) One of the things that
should be clear is that people often view problems in very different
ways. Hemple (1996) provides three overlapping perspectives on
environmental destruction, which are termed contamination,
ecosimplification, and natural resource consumption. Describe each
perspective and provide at least one example of the type of environmental
problems that are the focus of each perspective. |
|
5) One of the themes we
have explored so far this semester is that the simultaneous acceleration
of technoscientific progress and world population growth with a
corresponding environmental decline influence our popular images of the
future and these differences figure prominently in debates about
environmental policy. Hemple (1996) suggests that the three dominant
views are those of the cornucopians, catastrophists, and optimizers.
Describe each perspective and use an example of an environmental problem
to illustrate how each perspective would have a different view of the
future. |
|
6) Describe the stages of
the policy process and briefly describe some of the key activities that occur
during each stage. Be sure to provide examples where
possible. Then critique the policy process heuristic. What
are the strengths and weaknesses of using this model to understand how
policy develops. Finally, briefly describe the role that science
plays at each stage of the process? Where does it have its biggest
impact? Where does it appear to have the smallest impact? |
|
7) In the
different videos, handouts, and class discussions we have seen that science
often plays a critical role in the policy process. At the same
time, decisions are often made based on little or no science.
Describe the role science plays in the policy process. In your
answer be sure to discuss: 1) Which stages does science have the
strongest role? 2) where does science have the weakest role?
3) Is the world of policymaking different than the world of
science? 4) is environmental policymaking fundamentally different
than policymaking in other areas (e.g., crime, education, welfare,
etc.)? and 5) should science play a stronger role in developing
and implementing environmental policy? |
|
8)
Use elements of the policy
process model to explain how the events surrounding September 11, 2001 have
influenced policy regarding nuclear power and nuclear waste disposal in the
United States. In your answer be sure to describe how policy
entrepreneurs & policy saboteurs have use the events to influence public
opinion on nuclear power. What is the role of the media? Be sure
to also explain how these events have influenced agenda setting. |
|
9) For
years there have been proposals in Montana and Wyoming to restore the high
plains to their presettlement condition. Proposals range from having
the federal government acquire the land and turn it into a massive federal
preserve to having ranchers pull down their fences and buy into a common
herd of buffalo - the Buffalo Commons. Suppose you just
got a job as President Bush's natural resources
policy advisor. The President is aware of such
proposals and is interested in whether you think any of them are feasible.
What advice would you give the President if he was interested in restoring
the high plains to its presettlement conditions? Based on what we have
discussed in class and the politics described in Buffalo Commons,
critique the feasibility of such proposals in terms of their political
viability. You should use concepts from the policy process model or
Hemple's 8 causes of environmental problems to help make your arguments.
You should also use examples from the book to illustrate your points.
In crafting your answer be sure to consider such things as: Why have these
proposals not been elevated on the policy agenda? Who is for and
against such proposals? What level of government should make these
decisions? |
|
10) Suppose you are the new head
environmental policy analyst for the Governor of Nevada. The governor
is getting ready to go to Washington, DC to talk about the federal
government's plans to use Yucca Mountain as the only repository for storing
high level nuclear waste. Since you are new, the governor has asked
you to take a fresh look at the plans and to brief him on the advantages and
disadvantages of using Yucca Mountain as a disposal site. What
position do you recommend the governor to take in his discussions with
federal agency officials? |
|
|
Shaded terms & questions will not be on
the exam |