| |
ANWR
Debate (Memo #6)
|
Goal
of the Exercise:
|
To familiarize you with the various
environmental impacts, conflicts, and politics surrounding the exploration
and development of energy resources located on public lands. It will
also help you to learn how to analyze policy proposals and to develop your
skills of argument and persuasion. This semester, the class debate
will focus on President Bush's recent proposal to open up a portion of the
Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) for oil and natural gas exploration
and development. |
|
Issue for Debate
|
Should the Congress approve President
Bush's proposal to open up a portion of ANWR for oil and gas exploration
and development? |
|
Background
|
The Alaska National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR)
was created by Congress in 1980 when President Jimmy Carter signed
Alaska's National Interest Lands Conservation Act that expanded the
initial wilderness area designated pursuant to the 1964 Wilderness Act.
ANWR is approximately 19.5 million acres in northeastern Alaska, a region
larger than the states of New Hampshire, Vermont, and Massachusetts
combined. ANWR's wilderness area is off limits to the construction
of roads, buildings, and pipelines. It is also off limits to most
vehicles, timber harvesting, and to mining. Activities allowed are
mostly limited to hiking, camping, sport fishing, nonmotarized boating,
and similar low intensive recreational pursuits. Aircraft are not
allowed to fly in and out of the refuge. Section 1002 is a 1.5
million acre stretch of coastal tundra within the ANWR about 30 miles wide
and about 100 miles long. Only Congress has the authority to decide
whether oil and gas exploration and development will be allowed in this
part of the refuge or whether Section 1002 will become part of the
protected wilderness. The question for debate pertains to whether
Congress should open up some portion of Section 1002 for oil and gas
exploration and development. |
|
Class Debate
|
The assignment is relatively simple.
To ensure that each side is equal in number, each student will be assigned
to either the pro or the con position. You may pair up with up to one
other student to research your positions and prepare the written
assignment described below. You should begin by familiarizing
yourself with the proposal to open up a portion of ANWR for oil and
natural gas exploration and development by reading Bush's
National Energy Policy and the reserve reading, both of which have
background information. You may also want to examine a recent GAO
report on oil and gas activities in national wildlife refuges. Handouts
on various points of view on the ANWR debate are also available. The
following web sites contain a variety of competing facts and opinions that
should help you formulate the arguments you will advance during the
debate: |
|
|
|
The format of the debate will be as follows.
The pro and con groups will appoint members to argue key points in their
side in the debate. Each side will be allowed to make a short
opening statement of up to 5 minutes in order to present your main
arguments for or against the proposal. After each side has presented
its position, there will be a 2 minute rebuttal period. The other
members of the pro and con side of the audience will each be allowed to
ask questions to the opposing side's debate team. The questions will
alternate back and forth as time permits. The instructor will
moderate the question and answer period. Both debate teams should
come prepared to answer questions from the instructor as well. The
question and answer period will continue as time permits (probably around
25 minutes). Each debate team will then be allowed 2 minutes to make
a short closing statement.
Some class time will be provided for each side to
organize and decide on who will represent their views on the debate team.
Different members of the debate team are expected to present the opening
statement, take the lead in question and answer period, and deliver your
closing remarks. You may need to meet outside of class to prepare
for the debate if you do not use your class time effectively. All
students are expected to participate in the debate by either delivering
the opening remarks, rebuttal, closing statement, or by asking or
answering a question posed by the other side or the instructor.
Thus, regardless of which position you have been assigned, you are
expected to be fully informed about the arguments for and against the
proposal and come prepared to ask questions. Poor participation in
the debate will have an adverse affect on your class participation grade.
|
|
Written Assignment - Opinion Editorial
|
To ensure you come prepared to actively
participate in the class debate, you will be required to prepare a written
summary of your arguments whether they are for or against this proposal.
The format of this assignment will be an "op-ed" (opinion
editorial) article with a length of about 750 words (most word processing
programs have a word count function). See one of the many op-ed
handouts over the course of the semester for guidance on what styles are
appropriate. To receive an "A", it is expected
that your editorial will be similar in style, substance, and quality to
submit to a local paper for publication. You may work with up to one
other student to prepare your op-ed article. If you choose this
option, you will each receive the same grade for the assignment. |
|