Chapter 4: Interest Articulation

 

I. Interest articulation as part of political systems

         

A.   Many forms of interest articulation

 

IA – the process whereby citizens and social groups express their needs and demands to the government

 

o       citizens are members of society first, political action is secondary

o       IA can be individual or collective

o       What are the ways political interests are articulated in a given political arrangement? (political system)

o       Does the development of multiple group affiliations support democracy?  Why or why not?

 

B.    Growth as a result of internal social complexity, demands on government and widening communications venues

a.      Nuclear power, environmental preservation, clean water standards

                  

II. Citizen Action

 

A.                           As individuals, families, small groups, societies: Citizen action – human interaction is about working with one another to achieve our goals (college/fac/staff/students)

a.      Voting – most common form of participation (even in authoritarian systems)

b.     Keeps preferences stated and re-stated over time to the political system

c.     Blunt selection of political elites

d.     Volunteerism ???

 

C.   personal interest contacts

a.      writing, faxing, e-mailing, phoning, visiting your Congressmember

b.     another universal type of contact even in authoritarian system (how would this work in an authoritarian system?)

 

D.   spontaneous political protest – citizens act spontaneously as a group

a.      Chancellor Leutze selection

b.     Tiananmen Square – 1989

c.     Solidarity Movement – Poland (Papal visit 1979; mass protests 1980; collapse of communism 1989)

 

 

E.    Variety of ways in which citizens participate

a.      Voting

b.     Persuade others how to vote

c.     Work for party or candidate

d.     Community action (Stop the Dump)

e.      Contact local officials

f.       Signed a petition

g.     Participated in peaceful protest demonstration (planned)

                                                                          i.      One of the most visible forms of citizen action

                                                                        ii.      Reasons for protest: 1) groups that lack access or think they lack access to legitimate channels of government (these are the unplanned explosions of frustration) 2) peaceful protests are the continuance of “normal” politics by other means (its planned, its not anti-governmental but usually anti-policy – protesters tend to be better educated).

 

1.     why peaceful, organized protest?  Good method of gaining attention – especially if have a critical mass of protesters (hey, this is important to a lot of people!)

 

2.     high SES correlates with higher likelihood that individuals will use multiple methods of contacting

 

 

III. Interest Groups – more institutionalized form of contacting

          IG:     Enduring organizational structure

                   Professional staffs

                   Insiders to the political process

         

A.   Anomic groups:

a.      Spontaneous formation

b.     no planning/organization

c.     tend to act violently

d.     sometimes subgroups of larger class/goups of people

 

B.    Non associational groups:

a.      Rarely well organized

b.     Form on common interests (ethnicity, kinship, religion)

                                                                          i.      Very large group that is not formally organziaedmbrs have only dim identification (birders?) hard to organize these

                                                                        ii.      Small village or economic subgroup where members know each other intimately

 

C.   Institutional groups:

a.      formal groups

b.     other purpose than Interest Articulation (government, religion)

c.     corporate, union, governmental institution (Women of the Senate)

d.     has a socializing effect on individuals

 

D.   Associational groups:

a.      formed explicitly to represent interest

b.     socialize individuals

http://www.csuchico.edu/~kfountain/

 

A.   Civic groups: ideological or policy goal

a.      Socializing effect

 

IV. Civil Society

          -Participation in groups helps create a civil society bc/groups provide a socializing function

          -Groups members learn how to access the political system

          -Groups learn that the process is an important thing – not just results (voting even though your candidate looses – this is the problem with theories of voting that describe voting as an irrational behavior)

 

          -Groups may exist informally but interact internationally with individuals and other groups – extending the socializing effect to the global level (epistemic communities: Galápagos Archipelago – Charles Darwin Research Station).

 

          A. Interest group systems

1.     Pluralist

a.      Multiple groups may represent a single societal interest (many abortion groups on both sides of the argument; there are multiple labor groups and business groups)

b.     Membership is non-compulsory and limited

c.     Groups often are decentralized with limited organizational structure

d.     There is a clear separation between interest groups and the government

2.     Democratic Corporatist (more organized representation of interests)

a.      A single peak association normally represents each societal interest (business – Chambers of Commerce)

b.     Membership in the peak association is often compulsory and nearly universal

c.     Peak associations are centrally organized and direct the actions of their members

d.     Groups are often systematically involved in making and implementing policy (advisory role for government officials on the local economy)

 

-“single peak association” one group at the top of the triangle of a type of interest – all the different business people – represented by one business association/group of some sort (eg: Lowe’s and Belk together as members of the only business interest association or Solidarity as the de facto leader of the Trade Unions in 1980s Poland)

 

-these groups often work closely w/government to resolve policy problems (zoning/labor rights)

 

-countries w/ large and unified peak associations of labor and business that negotiate w/ one another and government have strong records (better than pluralist countries) at maintaining employment, restraining inflation and increasing social spending

          ex: Austria, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden (social partnership btw/govt, unions, and employer associations)

 

-corporatist systems can be more controlled and groups would then be dominated by government or a single larger interest (church, party = Mexico)

 

3.     Controlled interest group systems (corporatist but not as democratic)

a.      There is a single group for each sector

b.     Membership is often compulsory

c.     Each group is normally hierarchically organized

d.     Groups are controlled by the government or its agents in order to mobilize support for government policy

e.      Organizations are penetrated and dominated by political institutions (to facilitate government control of society- e and d are the same)

f.       Most common in authoritarian systems – communist systems – eg: China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam; non-communist systems – Brazil and Mexico)

 

V. Access to the influential

A.   to be influential interest groups must be able to access decisionmakers

B.    do this via channels of political access (no guarantee of result)

C.   two major types of resources that can be used to access the political elites:

1.     legitimate structures of government

2.     direct violence

D.   Legitimate (& constitutional) channels

1.     Personal connections – face to face has more weight

2.     Mass media – interest groups advertise (policy ads – immigration and Mexico)

3.     Political parties – Great Britain the party handles everything and government stems from the party – decentralized/weak parties like the usa system are less helpful – you contact the individual representative here

4.     Legislatures – the committees, a decentralized committee system and loose party discipline make legislatures more accessible for groups (USA, Germany) and less so when party discipline is greater (GB/France)

5.     Government bureaucracies – administrative discretion to administer laws/policies

6.     sometimes these are limited (what if a political system is dominated by a single party or the bureaucracy is professionalized or not – then you need to access the party and forget about everything else bc/that is the locus of power)

 

E. Coercive channels and tactics

                             Protest demonstrations

1.     Choice of the powerless

2.     increasingly a choice of the established – extension of normal politics by other means

3.     Successful if legitimacy of regime in question

4.     Terrorism reflects desires of groups to change the rules of the game.

What does Usama bin Laden want?  Islamic rule of the USA

 

VI. Policy perspectives on Interest Articulation

 

A.   Question of what policy preferences are expressed

a.      Are all groups created equal?

b.     Example: AARP versus ??? no association representing young taxpayers exists

B. Examples: extractive, distributive, regulative

 

VII. Interest Group Development

 

          A. Trend in democratic societies towards less participation

          B. Trend in non-democratic societies towards more participation