Brain's
Design Emerges As a Key to Emotions
By
DANIEL GOLEMAN
New York Times
Published: August 15, 1989
LEAD:
THE power of emotions to override even the most rational decisions may be
explained by a new discovery about the brain, researchers say. The data suggest
that the brain is arranged so key aspects of emotional life, like primitive
fears, can operate largely independent of thought.
THE
power of emotions to override even the most rational decisions may be explained
by a new discovery about the brain, researchers say. The data suggest that the
brain is arranged so key aspects of emotional life, like primitive fears, can
operate largely independent of thought.
This
arrangement may explain why certain emotional reactions, like phobias, are so
tenacious despite their obvious irrationality. It may also explain other
baffling facts of emotional life, such as why troubling experiences from life's
earliest years can have such powerful effects decades later.
''This
may explain why we have so little reflective insight into our emotional life,''
said Dr. Joseph LeDoux, a psychologist at the Center
for Neural Science at
''Dr.
LeDoux has made a major discovery about the emotional
side of learning, one with major implications for learned pathologies like
neuroses and phobias,'' said Dr. Norman Weinberger, a neuroscientist at the
Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory at the
Tne new work is, so far, known largely among specialists in cognitive
neurobiology, a field that specializes in tracing connections between the brain
and psychological life. While further studies will be needed to verify the
findings of Dr. LeDoux and their significance, other
researchers have already begun to use his results in their own work. Dr.
Weinberger, for instance, is applying the findings in his studies of memory
problems in Alzheimer's disease.
Dr.
LeDoux's research, which was done entirely in rats,
included such standard techniques as cutting specific nerve pathways in the
brain to see how it changed the rats' behavior.
''The
architecture of the mammalian brain is basically the same in all species, but
you can't do these kinds of studies in a human brain,'' Dr. LeDoux
explained.
The
new evidence suggests that certain emotional reactions occur before the brain
has even had time to fully register what it is that is causing the reaction;
the emotion occurs before thought. That view is a direct challenge to the
prevailing wisdom in psychology, that emotional
reactions follow from thoughts about a situation.
The
data also call into question a longstanding view about just which brain
structures link together to form the ''limbic system,'' which regulates
emotional life. The hippocampus, which has long been considered part of the
limbic system, may be more involved with registering cognitive information than
emotions, according to findings of other researchers reviewed by Dr. LeDoux in an article to appear in the journal Cognition and
Emotion this year.
His
own data put another part of the limbic system, the amygdala,
at the center of the primitive emotional reactions that seem to operate
independent of, and prior to, thought.
Scientists
had assumed that the amygdala, part of the brain that
registers emotion, depended on signals from the neocortex,
the thinking part of the brain, to form an emotional reaction. The work of Dr. LeDoux suggests that in many cases the amygdala
triggers an emotional reaction before the thinking brain has fully processed
nerve singals. Deep-Rooted Emotions
''To
simplify greatly, the hippocampus seems to be the focal point for cognition and
the amygdala for emotion,'' Dr. LeDoux
said. ''The hippocampus, for instance, is involved in recognizing a face and
its significance, such as that it's your cousin. The amygdala
adds that you really don't like him. It offers emotional reactions from memory,
independent of your thoughts at the moment about something.
Emotional
reactions and emotional memories can be formed without any conscious, cognitive
participation at all, because anatomically the emotional system can act independently.''
Dr. LeDoux said.
While
other researchers had recorded activity in the thalamus or the amygdala during the moments when fear is learned, it was
Dr. LeDoux who discovered the direct connection that
links them during the process.
''Dr.
LeDoux's research is the first to work out neural
pathways for emotional response that don't go through the cortex,'' said Dr.
Michael Gazzaniga, a psychiatry professor at
Dr.
Weinberger said, ''It's the missing piece of the puzzle, showing that fear can
be learned without the cortex being involved. It brings to amygdala
to the forefront in studying emotions.''
The
prevailing view among neuroscientists is that the eyes, ears and other sensory
organs transmit signals to the thalamus, and from
there to sensory processing areas of the neocortex,
where the signals are put together into objects as people perceive them.
The
signals are sorted for meanings so that the brain recognizes what an object is
and what its presence means. From the neocortex, the
signals are sent to the amygdala. Thus emotional
reactions usually follow from cognitive understanding.
But
Dr. LeDoux has discovered nerve pathways that lead
directly from the thalamus to the amygdala, in
addition to those going through the cortex. That means that the amygdala can also receive direct inputs from the senses
before they are fully registered by the rest of the brain.
Thus
emotions can be triggered before the brain has had time to fully register just
what it is that is being responded to. This is most pronounced in an emergency,
when an instant response is required.
''The
amygdala is just one synapse away from the thalamus,
while the hippocampus is several additional synapses away,'' Dr. LeDoux said. That means a difference of as much as 40
milliseconds, about a twenty-fifth of a second, in the time it takes a sensory
signal to reach the amygdala as compared with the
hippocampus, Dr. LeDoux said. Aid in Responding
Quickly
That
time gap allows the amygdala to respond to an
alarming situation before the hippocampus does. For instance, if in the corner
of your eye you see what looks like a snake, it is the amygdala
that sends the signal of alarm that makes you jump. You react even before the
hippocampus has had time to figure out if it was actually a snake or a piece of
rope.
This
arrangement has had great survival value in evolution, Dr. LeDoux
believes. He observes that in more primitive species, like birds, fish and
reptiles, the connections between the thalamus and the amygdala
play a major role in mental life.
''This
primitive, minor brain system in mammals is the main system in nonmammals,'' Dr. LeDoux said.
''It offers a very rapid way to turn on emotions. Those extra milliseconds may
be lifesaving, which is a powerful advantage in evolution. But it's a quick and
dirty process; the cells are fast, but not very precise.''
The
amygdala triggers what Dr. LeDoux
calls ''pre-cognitive emotion,'' feelings independent of thought.
''Pre-cognitive
emotion is based on neural bits and pieces of sensory information, which have
not yet been sorted out and integrated into a recognizable object,'' he said.
''It's a very raw form of sensory information like recognizing the notes
without noticing the melody.'' Patterns From Infancy
Dr.
LeDoux believes these pre-cognitive emotions may be
at work in many areas of human mental life. For instance, they may explain the
nature of the emotional life of infants, and the lifelong persistence of
emotional patterns formed in infancy.
''A
tremendous amount of learning takes place during the first two years of life,
yet we have little if any conscious recall from those years,'' Dr. LeDoux said. The reason it is so hard to remember
experiences from those years, he believes, is because the hippocampus is not
fully mature at birth, while the amygdala is more
fully formed during the first years of life.
That
may also explain why the emotional experiences of life's earliest years, which
psychoanalysts have long pointed to as key to later emotional life, are both so
potent and so difficult to understand rationally.
As
psychotherapists have long known, emotional memories - like deep fears or
resentments - are particularly persistent and hard to counter. Dr. LeDoux is soon to publish research showing that these
robust emotional habits are formed and stored in the amygdala.
In
an article to be published this month in The Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
Dr. LeDoux reports a study with laboratory rats that
were taught to fear a flashing light by having it paired with a shock.
Ordinarily, once the fear is learned, it can be gradually extinguished by
regular displays of the lights without the shock; this process typically takes
several weeks.
When
some of the rats had their visual cortexes removed, they still learned to fear
the lights - evidence that it is the connection to the amygdala
that is crucial in forming such fears. When those same rats were shown the
lights without the shock for several weeks, they retained fearfulness, unlike
rats whose brains had the cortex intact. Formation of Phobias
This
may explain how phobias are formed in humans, and why they can be so tenacious,
Dr. LeDoux said.
''In
people who have gotten over a phobia, a single scary experience can sometimes
suddenly bring it back in full force,'' he said. ''That means the phobia had
not been lost to emotional memory, even though the behavior had been
extinguished.''
The
implications of Dr. LeDoux's work for psychotherapy
are in offering a neuroanatomical explanation for
phenomenon long observed.
''Once
your emotional system learns something, it seems you never let it go,'' Dr. LYDoux said. ''What therapy does is teach you to control
it. It teaches your cortex how to inhibit your amygdala.
The propensity to act is suppressed, while your basic emotions about it may
remain in a subdued form.''
The
psychoanalytic view that the unconscious mind has profound influence in mental
life also finds support in Dr. LeDoux's work. ''While
some emotional memories may reach consciousness, there are many emotional
memories that lead to actions, but which we do not consciously remember,'' Dr. LeDoux said.
He
cited a study showing that people formed preferences for geometric shapes
flashed so quickly that they were not aware of having seen them. His own work suggests that the amygdala
may be involved in such preferences.